<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>89501</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-04-18 03:16 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-perl/Convert-UUlib New version fix security issue</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-26 22:52:21 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <status_whiteboard>B2? [glsa] jaervosz</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>jaervosz@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>net-mail@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>perl@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 03:16:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Snippet from Changelog:

1.05 Fri Feb 25 22:50:27 CET 2005
        - fix a (likely exploitable) segfault problem, (tracked down
          and/or reported by Mark Martinec and Robert Lewis).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 10:25:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>1.051 in the tree and ready for arch&apos;s to test.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 10:29:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Arches please test and mark stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 10:34:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>any hints for testing?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 10:38:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>FEATURES=&quot;maketest&quot; emerge ... :)
Most perl stuff has autotests, specially when the ebuild has SRC_TEST=&quot;do&quot;.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 11:10:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on amd64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hansmi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 11:32:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on ppc.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 12:36:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>SRC_TEST=&quot;do&quot; is enabled by default - I can provide additional tests if you have some functionality in mind you want to test :)

Unless rep&apos;s from x86 or sparc mind, I can test and bump for these platforms.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-18 13:46:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable for x86 and sparc.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kloeri@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-19 11:14:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on alpha.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-19 12:30:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>tigger/taviso could you look into this and perhaps provide a bit more detail for a GLSA?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-19 13:25:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Shouldn&apos;t we get the amavis &amp;&amp; amavisd-new maintainers on this bug? They should bump their ebuilds to specifically reflect the new version</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-19 13:39:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>net-mail please bump dependencies.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-19 23:24:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-20 00:18:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Both amavis and amavisd-new bumped to use &gt;=dev-perl/Convert-UUlib-1.051</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-21 01:27:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Upstream contacted by taviso.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-26 22:52:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200504-26</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>