<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>8578</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2002-09-30 12:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-arch/rpm create dead symlink</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2003-02-04 19:42:18 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>gaarde@yahoo.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>blocke@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gaarde@yahoo.com</who>
            <bug_when>2002-09-30 12:10:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>lab / # ls -l /usr/lib/rpmpopt 
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           11 Sep 23 13:54 /usr/lib/rpmpopt -&gt;
rpm/rpmpopt

lab / # locate rpmpopt
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmpopt-4.0.4
/usr/lib/rpmpopt


Without looking into this any further than just finding it... my guess is to
patch the ebuild to perform a &apos;ln -sf /usr/lib/rpm/rpmpopt-${PV} /usr/lib/rpmpopt&apos;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blocke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2002-10-12 03:47:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>
Hmm... that symlink doesn&apos;t exist anywhere on the Redhat 7.3 installs I have
access to so I&apos;m going to just remove it.  (see -r4 ebuild)

Thanks for the bug report.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>