<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>84992</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-03-12 08:44 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>keywording request for dev-java/commons-logging-1.0.4-r1</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-04 08:32:13 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>luckyduck@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>luckyduck@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>java@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ppc@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>sparc@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-12 08:44:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>the old ebuild (-r0) made use of binary packages (see #75856). to remove these dependencies we had to add some new packages to the tree. these recently introduced packages missing some keywords which the -r0 ebuild has. i dropped these keywords from the -r1 ebuild for the moment. ppc, ppc64 and sparc:

please mark the following packages ~arch, afterwards feel free to re-add your keywords to dev-java/commons-logging-1.0.4-r1:


=dev-java/avalon-logkit-1.2
=dev-java/avalon-framework-4.2.0

thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-13 11:41:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>added ~ppc64 to KEYWORDS</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-19 15:57:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>since ppc and sparc are still on cc, i just add another request to this list

i have to drop ~ppc and ~sparc from another package, fop-0.20.5-r2 because that version doesn&apos;t make use of packed jars any longer (fixed bug #63262). it relies the avalon-framework-4.1* which miss these keywords:

  RDEPEND.bad                    1
   dev-java/fop/fop-0.20.5-r2.ebuild: ~ppc [&apos;=dev-java/avalon-framework-4.1*&apos;]
  RDEPEND.badindev               1
   dev-java/fop/fop-0.20.5-r2.ebuild: ~sparc [&apos;=dev-java/avalon-framework-4.1*&apos;]

please also add your keywords to that version, and afterwards to the new fop revision if appropriate.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-25 20:04:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>~sparc done for commons-logging.
Some observations:
xerces-2 doesn&apos;t seem to like FEATURES=&quot;usersandbox userpriv&quot; for us at least, the jvm will sig11 otherwise.
fop can use sun-jai-bin, which includes a binary-only component for x86, isn&apos;t this required at all/optional optimizations or what? (this question applies to other arches too).
fop breaks on batik-1.5, again, with a sig11 on the jvm. I didn&apos;t find a workaround. Dunno if the later batik-1.5.1*&apos;s would cut it.
avalon-logkit-2.0 seems to be sensitive when USE=&quot;jms&quot; is enabled and you have jms, openjms &amp; openjms-bin around. This might be a sparc-specific thingy though (jvm sig11).
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>sejo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-03 01:02:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>fixed the rdepend issues, 

some thoughts, the problems gustavoz said are on ppc also, better to review the openjms thingie completely, i&apos;ll talk to luckduck about it. 

greetings</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-04 08:32:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i can&apos;t reproduce the sig11 problems on either x86, amd64 or ppc. that seems to be indeed related to sparc. i&apos;ve excluded openjms from ppc for the moment. it seems that that package and some of the deps needs some loving again. i&apos;ll do that in the next week or something. marking this one as fixed, thanks for your effort.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>