<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>83136</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-02-23 20:51 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-editors/emacs-cvs should be masked</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-02-25 14:57:53 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>salivian@gmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>emacs@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com</cc>
    
    <cc>qa@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>salivian@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-23 20:51:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>as subject.

emerging 21.3.50 -&gt; 22.0.50 as I think 22 becomes the main stream in CVS now.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>usata@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-24 19:24:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>emacs-21.3.50.ebuild has &quot;x86 ppc sparc ~amd64&quot; keywords,
so emacs-22.0.50.ebuild should be marked stable on x86, ppc, and sparc
before removing emacs-21.3.50.ebuild. 

ppc and sparc team: please mark emacs-22.0.50.ebuild stable on your arch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weeve@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-26 19:29:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sparctastic</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-05 00:55:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked ppc stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>usata@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-05 06:22:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks. Removed emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild from CVS.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-10 18:12:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Why is this ebuild stable?  Its a CVS ebuild, therefore, can&apos;t be considered &quot;stable&quot;.  We should throw this back to atleast ~arch for everyone, if not KEYWORDS=&quot;-*&quot;.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-11 04:44:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Based on some reasearch, it has to do with bug 22225, which is now fixed.

 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-editors/emacs-cvs/emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild?hideattic=0&amp;rev=1.28&amp;view=log</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-24 21:44:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>emacs-cvs-22.0.50 is stable on a few archs.  As far as I can tell this is a live CVS ebuild.  Why are any of these unmasked?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mkennedy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-25 10:53:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-25 10:59:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That hasn&apos;t been an issue for a very long time.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-25 12:31:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?
&gt; 

I don&apos;t see how comment #6 is related.  There are live CVS ebuilds in the tree that are not package.masked.  If I&apos;m wrong, someone please correct me.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mkennedy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-25 14:57:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I removed the ebuild containing stable keywords.

app-editors/emacs-cvs won&apos;t be package.masked however.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>