8313 2002-09-24 10:54 0000 ut2003demo 1080c must be applied on top of 1080b 2003-02-04 19:42:18 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Games unspecified x86 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 kode54@earthlink.net vapier@gentoo.org fisi.tilman.klar@gmx.de kode54@earthlink.net 2002-09-24 10:54:20 0000 1080c doesn't appear to be a stand-alone patch. The server browser is obviously missing the jittery sorting fix, which is part of the 1080b update. Apparently, they decided not to make 1080c a cumulative patch. I have already made an ebuild myself, the process is as simple as applying both patches in order, but I leave that up to you in the event that you find a cleaner way of arranging the ebuild. I'll upload and link later if it becomes necessary. vapier@gentoo.org 2002-09-24 16:49:15 0000 if you post the ebuild we'll take a look at it vapier@gentoo.org 2002-09-25 10:57:47 0000 phoenix: im stealing this one since (1) i put out the 1080c patch and (2) i have an ebuild that works fisi.tilman.klar@gmx.de 2002-09-25 12:46:49 0000 Heyas Spanky, you didnt change too much did you? I looked into the ebuild but i was unable to find any new, major enhancements (no offense there) - if you implemented a major change (layout,whatever..) please tell me. Sorry for not taking care of that stuff myself, i lost 512MB ram yesterday so i had quite some downtime (crappy noname ram, dont you ever buy that). Thanks for your help, -phoen][x- besides, what do you mean with "(2) i have an ebuild that works" - mine worked, didnt it? vapier@gentoo.org 2002-09-25 12:54:10 0000 i just abstracted your code ... basically i defined 'PATCH1' and 'PATCH2' and rewrote bits in a for loop ... for PATCH in $PATCH1 $PATCH2 ; do <patch code> done i use a lot of noname ram ;) well, pc133 i do ... got about 2+gigs of it in 2 servers my desktop though has the good stuff for pc333 :D