<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>81727</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-02-12 05:43 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>new version : libusb-0.1.10</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-03-18 04:19:24 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>casta@xwing.info</reporter>
          <assigned_to>liquidx@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr</cc>
    
    <cc>eradicator@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>phosphan@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>casta@xwing.info</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-12 05:43:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>libusb need to be updated to 0.1.10 version
Bump of 0.1.8 ebuild removing the amd64 fPIC patch work for me (on ~x86)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>casta@xwing.info</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-12 05:45:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=51053)
New libusb ebuild
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>casta@xwing.info</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-12 05:46:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=51054)
Patch for amd64-fPIC
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-20 15:16:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>from the libusb website:

The current stable version of libusb is 0.1.10a. This release fixes a variety of bugs, some of which are important. It is highly reccomended to use this version.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>liquidx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-18 03:10:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>eradicator, are you planning to take over maintaining this? i was about to bump this after i did some testing. but if you want to take over maintaining this, then please let me know.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>eradicator@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-18 03:22:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>It&apos;s late here, so please excuse my taking this bug BEFORE sending you email...  I was just about to send you one, honest ;).  It looks like kdebase doesn&apos;t like 0.1.8 of libusb (atleast not here on amd64), so it needs some bumping.  I was going to take care of this since I&apos;m testing it right now, but if you&apos;re on it already, then by all means by my guest... it is your package after all... =)  Also, I think the -fPIC stuff should get the boot as libtool should be smart enough to handle it correctly on amd64, and globally adding it to CFLAGS as is done here results in PIC code ending up in a static lib.  I realize this was done to &quot;fix&quot; libgphoto, but this hack is unacceptable and libgphoto is the culprit that needs to be fixed to work properly with libusb.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>liquidx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-03-18 04:19:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>in portage and fpic patch removed. i&apos;ll prob have to go get an account on the amd64 dev boxes to keep up with all these problems ;) thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>51053</attachid>
            <date>2005-02-12 05:45 0000</date>
            <desc>New libusb ebuild</desc>
            <filename>libusb-0.1.10.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA1IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>51054</attachid>
            <date>2005-02-12 05:46 0000</date>
            <desc>Patch for amd64-fPIC</desc>
            <filename>libusb-0.1.10-amd64-fPIC.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlLmluLm9yaWcgIDIwMDUtMDItMTIgMTQ6MzA6NDUuNTkxNDE2NzEyICswMTAw
CisrKyBNYWtlZmlsZS5pbiAgICAgICAyMDA1LTAyLTEyIDE0OjMxOjAxLjMwOTk0Njc5MiArMDEw
MApAQCAtMTM5LDcgKzEzOSw3IEBACiBCVUlMRF9ET0NTX1RSVUUgPSBAQlVJTERfRE9DU19UUlVF
QAogQ0MgPSBAQ0NACiBDQ0RFUE1PREUgPSBAQ0NERVBNT0RFQAotQ0ZMQUdTID0gQENGTEFHU0AK
K0NGTEFHUyA9IEBDRkxBR1NAIC1mUElDCiBDUFAgPSBAQ1BQQAogQ1BQRkxBR1MgPSBAQ1BQRkxB
R1NACiBDWFggPSBAQ1hYQAo=
</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>