<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>77577</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-01-11 12:42 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>iverilog stable (x86) ebuild refers to broken code snapshot (verilog-0.7.tar.gz).</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-01-12 12:40:09 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>brandon.atkinson@ieee.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>sci@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>brandon.atkinson@ieee.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-11 12:42:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Trying to emerge iverilog with the stable x86 flag set, portage attempts to merge with version 0.7.  The URI in the ebuild refers to a broken snapshot of 0.7.  This is obviously not a portage problem, but it is interesting that a broken snapshot is used for the &apos;stable&apos; build, while the unstable flag ~x86 works. 

I have verified that 0.7 tarball is broken by downloading the file by hand and attempting to install.



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge iverilog (with USE=&quot;x86&quot;)
2. compile dies during compilation of load_module.cc
3. 

Actual Results:  
Build stops due to compilation failure.  The tar.gz contains broken code.  

Expected Results:  
Build works, iverilog is installed correctly.

I understand that we have no control over bad files upstream, but should broken
code be chosen for the stable build over working code (i.e. verilog-0.8)?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>phosphan@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-12 09:33:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>0.8 is only in portage for a few days, but considering that I can&apos;t get 0.7 to build with gcc 3.3 or 3.4 I think you are right. Looks like most people who use it emerged it long ago in the past when it still went through the compiler.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-12 12:40:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>0.8 stabled on x86 in CVS; please reopen this bug and let me know if that also has issues. Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>