77231 2005-01-09 07:04 0000 unionfs-1.0.5 [new ebuild] 2005-01-10 14:55:36 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED EBUILD P2 enhancement --- 1 radek@podgorny.cz kernel@gentoo.org radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-09 07:04:37 0000 Unionfs is a linux kernel module which allows filesystems to be mounted on top of each other... Submitting almost-done ebuild (don't have time). Resolving the sandbox violation when installing the module should be the last thing necessary... Hope it helps, looking forward to seeing it in portage, soon... Thanks... Radek radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-09 07:05:28 0000 Created an attachment (id=48017) unionfs-1.0.5.ebuild radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-09 07:06:01 0000 Created an attachment (id=48018) Makefile26.patch genstef@gentoo.org 2005-01-09 07:19:32 0000 Just out of curiosity, for what do you use it? Maybe we could direct it to the right people then and find a maintainer for it. radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-09 08:16:18 0000 This is a cool thing indeed. You can mount both /mnt/partition1/movies and /mnt/partition2/movies to /mnt/movies and you can see something like a logical-or of the two dirs. This can of course be achieved with LVM or RAID but when one drive fails, you lose everything... :-( Using unionfs you lose just the affected part... ...you can also do stuff like mounting a writeable fs over a CD so the it feels like you can write onto the CD. Unionfs has been in BSD for a while so you can try to find more documentation there... plasmaroo@gentoo.org 2005-01-09 08:47:28 0000 Looking at that Makefile patch, "`uname -r`" isn't ideal - it should install to whatever version /usr/src/linux is pointing to; not what the running kernel is. dsd@gentoo.org 2005-01-09 08:51:15 0000 The ebuild also should not use the kernel-mod eclass radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-09 11:31:13 0000 I'm sorry guys, I'm not an ebuild guru. Just robbed the kernel-mod stuff from hostap-driver... :-( genstef@gentoo.org 2005-01-10 11:22:12 0000 Thank you, in the tree now (with the correct linux-mod of course) I did not add it as version 1.0.6, because that version did not compile for me. Kernel: 2.6.10-ac8 radek@podgorny.cz 2005-01-10 14:55:36 0000 Thank you... 1.0.6 didn't work for me aswell so I'm gonna stick with 1.0.5 for a while... :-) 48017 2005-01-09 07:05 0000 unionfs-1.0.5.ebuild unionfs-1.0.5.ebuild text/plain IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk ZXI6Cgppbmhlcml0IGV1dGlscyBrZXJuZWwtbW9kCgpERVNDUklQVElPTj0iZnVzZS1iYXNlZCBm aWxlc3lzdGVtIGZvciBtYWludGFpbmluZyBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGZpbGVzIgpIT01FUEFHRT0i aHR0cDovL3d3dy5mc2wuY3Muc3VueXNiLmVkdS9wcm9qZWN0LXVuaW9uZnMuaHRtbCIKU1JDX1VS ST0iZnRwOi8vZnRwLmZzbC5jcy5zdW55c2IuZWR1L3B1Yi8ke1BOfS8ke1B9LnRhci5neiIKTElD RU5TRT0iR1BMLTIiClNMT1Q9IjAiCktFWVdPUkRTPSJ+eDg2IgpJVVNFPSIiCiNSRVNUUklDVD0i bm9zdHJpcCIKREVQRU5EPSIiCiNSREVQRU5EPSIiCgpzcmNfdW5wYWNrKCkgewoJdW5wYWNrICR7 QX0KCWNkICR7U30gfHwgZGllCgoJIyAyLjYuPyBrZXJuZWwgaW5zdGFsbCB0YXJnZXQKCWVwYXRj aCAke0ZJTEVTRElSfS9NYWtlZmlsZTI2LnBhdGNoCn0KCnNyY19jb21waWxlKCkgewoJc2V0X2Fy Y2hfdG9fa2VybmVsCgllbWFrZSB8fCBkaWUKCXNldF9hcmNoX3RvX3BvcnRhZ2UKfQoKc3JjX2lu c3RhbGwoKSB7CglzZXRfYXJjaF90b19rZXJuZWwKCWVtYWtlIFBSRUZJWD0ke0R9IGluc3RhbGwg fHwgZGllCglzZXRfYXJjaF90b19wb3J0YWdlCn0K 48018 2005-01-09 07:06 0000 Makefile26.patch Makefile26.patch text/plain LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlIAkyMDA1LTAxLTA1IDE4OjA2OjM4LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDEwMAorKysgTWFr ZWZpbGUyCTIwMDUtMDEtMDcgMTU6NTQ6NDQuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMTAwCkBAIC03MSw3ICs3MSw4 IEBACiAJY3AgbWFuL3VuaW9uZnMuNCAke1BSRUZJWH0vbWFuL21hbjQKIAljcCBtYW4vdW5pb25j dGwuOCAke1BSRUZJWH0vbWFuL21hbjgKIAljcCBtYW4vdW5pb25kYmcuOCAke1BSRUZJWH0vbWFu L21hbjgKLQljcCB1bmlvbmZzLm8gL2xpYi9tb2R1bGVzL2B1bmFtZSAtcmAva2VybmVsL2ZzCisJ aWYgWyAtZiB1bmlvbmZzLmtvIF0gOyB0aGVuIGNwIHVuaW9uZnMua28gL2xpYi9tb2R1bGVzL2B1 bmFtZSAtcmAva2VybmVsL2ZzIDsgZWxzZSBjcCB1bmlvbmZzLm8gL2xpYi9tb2R1bGVzL2B1bmFt ZSAtcmAva2VybmVsL2ZzIDsgZmkKKwkJCiAKIHJlbGVhc2U6IHVuaW9uZnMtJHtWRVJTSU9OfS50 YXIuZ3oKIAo=