<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>75617</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-12-25 04:14 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>new version of XVID video library is available 1.0.3</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-01-08 23:04:45 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.xvid.org/</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>vojcek@tlen.pl</reporter>
          <assigned_to>media-video@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vojcek@tlen.pl</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-25 04:14:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>http://files.xvid.org/downloads/xvidcore-1.0.3.tar.bz2

Simple bump of 1.02 ebuild is enough</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>steven@cfdesign.dyndns.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-27 21:55:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Personally, I had to move files/1.0.2-DESTDIR.patch to files/1.0.3-DESTDIR.patch, and comment out the two lines in the ebuild referring to files/xvid-1.0.1-64bit-clean.patch.  However, I am running on AMD64, so that might be the cause of the differences.

Compiled cleanly, and appears stable.  I&apos;m on the first pass of a long two-pass encoding, so I have no indication as to quality as of yet; if any problems appear (perhaps as a result of the removal of the second patch) I&apos;ll be sure to post back here.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>luckyduck@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-08 23:04:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>new version now in the portage tree. it seems that as of version 1.0.3 the 64bit patch isn&apos;t needed any longer.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>