<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>73867</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-12-08 22:35 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>webapp-config uses deprecated qpkg</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-25 06:50:27 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>genone@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>web-apps@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>gentoobugs@blamey.me.uk</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genone@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-08 22:35:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>qpkg is deprecated and will likely be removed in future gentoolkit releases, better use equery instead. You should be able to just replace the `qpkg -I -l -nc $1-$2` with `equery --nocolor files =$1-$2`.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genone@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-02-20 19:39:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>any news on this?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 05:02:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hey, now it</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 05:02:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hey, now it´s finally broken (Bug 90353), so will this bug receive _any_ attention in next few months? Won´t mark the above bug as duplicate b/c apparently noone cares about this one. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:01:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Jakub, there is no need for that attitude, especially not on bugs.  Developers are stretched very thin, and of course have work and real lives competing with Gentoo development.  Sometimes bugs slip through the cracks, as this one has.

I&apos;ll have this fixed in the next few days if Stuart or someone else from the web-apps herd doesn&apos;t get to it before me.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:25:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 90353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:32:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I did not mean to offend anyone, was just trying to get some real attention to this bug since it</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:32:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I did not mean to offend anyone, was just trying to get some real attention to this bug since it´s a serious problem now and there has been zero response so far. 

So - nice to hear from you, hope this one gets fixed as soon as possible. Sorry if I was too loud and thanks. ;-)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ka0ttic@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:38:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well the reason no one hasn&apos;t paid any attention to this bug is because webapp-config is Stuart&apos;s baby.  Now, however it MUST be fixed to avoid lots of breakage, Stuart or not.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ka0ttic@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-04-25 06:50:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in 1.10-r12.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>