<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>69181</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-10-27 13:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dev-perl/MIME-tools 5.415 includes security fixes</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-11-02 10:25:36 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <status_whiteboard>B3 [glsa]</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>linux4ibook@free.fr</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>perl@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>linux4ibook@free.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-27 13:10:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-October/024959.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-October/024964.html

Initial post about the problem : 
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0410&amp;L=mailscanner&amp;T=0&amp;F=&amp;S=&amp;P=126285



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-27 13:40:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Perl team, please bump.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-28 03:19:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added. Tested on sparc and x86, so I can unmask there, but will need other archs before continuing.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>sejo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-28 04:51:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc
also had to mark MIME-Base64-3.05 stable or repoman complained... (poor thing)

greetings</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-28 05:40:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ok, marked stable on x86 and sparc (should have done it to begin with, sorry folks)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kloeri@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-30 03:03:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Eek! for some reason I forgot to mention that I stabled MIME-tools on alpha yesterday..</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-01 02:27:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Do we need a GLSA ? This one is much like the Archive-Zip thing (allow virus detection evasion on some mail scanning systems)... and we issued one for that.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-01 03:02:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I think we should issue a GLSA for this one as well.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>sgala@apache.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-01 05:09:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This version breaks tests (and thus ebuild) of SOAP-Lite. SOAP-Lite builds with 5.413 and 5.414, though

Also, while 5.415 is labelled &quot;ppc&quot;, 5.414 is labelled &quot;~ppc&quot;, which looks funny.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-02 03:23:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We asked ppc to test and unmask this version - hence the jump.

It does *not* break SOAP-Lite-60a-r1. There was a mistake in the ebuild which I corrected this morning and retested. SOAP-Lite-60a-r1 works fine with 5.413 and up, including 5.415. If you can pass me some code that doesn&apos;t work I&apos;d be happy to test it out. The tests will fail with the flush because of a flaw in the tests themselves, not SOAP-Lite/MIME-tools interaction.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-02 04:08:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-02 10:25:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200411-06</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>