67815 2004-10-16 14:48 0000 remove PAM requirement in Gentoo 2006-06-02 04:06:29 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Core system unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 35405 69066 1 vapier@gentoo.org base-system@gentoo.org clmason@gmail.com franke.daniel@gmail.com greg_g@gentoo.org solar@gentoo.org spock@trilithium.com vapier@gentoo.org 2004-10-16 14:48:33 0000 this bug is to help us track what needs to be done in order to get Gentoo to work just fine without PAM currently i know of these issues: - PROVIDE be conditional via USE: Bug 32114 - install login.defs with shadow when USE=-pam: Bug 35405 - remove pam / pam-login from profiles/base/packages since `USE=pam emerge shadow` would do the right thing code@edoceo.com 2004-10-26 13:46:24 0000 See also 69066 vapier@gentoo.org 2004-10-28 19:32:56 0000 ok, all resolved now except for Bug 69066: we need to: - create a virtual/login and put it into base/packages - remove pam / pam-login from base/packages - add a virtual/login in base/virtuals with pam-login as default provider sebastian_ml@gmx.net 2004-11-09 11:35:56 0000 Hi! Are there any updates on this matter? I'd really like PAM to be removed from my Gentoo. Thanks Sebastian vapier@gentoo.org 2004-11-09 21:38:53 0000 we have to close sub bugs before we can close this one ;) atm we need portage-2.0.51-r4 or better to be released vapier@gentoo.org 2004-11-23 20:36:00 0000 ok, for now, we have just shadow and pam-login that provide /bin/login so rather than screwing around with virtual/login, i updated shadow-4.0.[56] like this: DEPEND=" pam? ( sys-libs/pam sys-apps/pam-login ) !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) " ps.m@gmx.net 2004-11-25 00:14:28 0000 DEPEND=" pam? ( sys-libs/pam sys-apps/pam-login ) !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) " the above condition was entered as DEPEND=" pam? ( sys-libs/pam sys-apps/pam-login ) !pam? ( sys-apps/pam-login ) /* w/o additional ! */ " and it pulls in pam-login for all cases (and pam-login depending on pam pulls pam also in) uclibc killed I can't disable RESOLVED FIXED, but it is not resolved fixed All shadow versions stable and up are involved solar@gentoo.org 2004-11-25 06:57:45 0000 Reopeing bug per comment #6 Attempting to verify. solar@gentoo.org 2004-11-25 07:26:09 0000 Updating the ebuild to refelect Index: shadow-4.0.5-r2.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/shadow/shadow-4.0.5-r2.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -b -B -w -p -r1.4 shadow-4.0.5-r2.ebuild --- shadow-4.0.5-r2.ebuild 24 Nov 2004 04:34:46 -0000 1.4 +++ shadow-4.0.5-r2.ebuild 25 Nov 2004 15:23:41 -0000 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ IUSE="pam selinux nls skey" RDEPEND=">=sys-libs/cracklib-2.7-r3 pam? ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.75-r4 sys-apps/pam-login ) - !pam? ( sys-apps/pam-login ) + !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) skey? ( app-admin/skey ) selinux? ( sys-libs/libselinux )" DEPEND="${DEPEND} Index: shadow-4.0.5-r3.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/shadow/shadow-4.0.5-r3.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -b -B -w -p -r1.3 shadow-4.0.5-r3.ebuild --- shadow-4.0.5-r3.ebuild 24 Nov 2004 04:34:46 -0000 1.3 +++ shadow-4.0.5-r3.ebuild 25 Nov 2004 15:23:42 -0000 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ IUSE="pam selinux nls skey" RDEPEND=">=sys-libs/cracklib-2.7-r3 pam? ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.75-r4 sys-apps/pam-login ) - !pam? ( sys-apps/pam-login ) + !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) skey? ( app-admin/skey ) selinux? ( sys-libs/libselinux )" DEPEND="${DEPEND} Index: shadow-4.0.6.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/shadow/shadow-4.0.6.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -b -B -w -p -r1.3 shadow-4.0.6.ebuild --- shadow-4.0.6.ebuild 24 Nov 2004 04:34:46 -0000 1.3 +++ shadow-4.0.6.ebuild 25 Nov 2004 15:23:42 -0000 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ IUSE="pam selinux nls skey" RDEPEND=">=sys-libs/cracklib-2.7-r3 pam? ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.75-r4 sys-apps/pam-login ) - !pam? ( sys-apps/pam-login ) + !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) skey? ( app-admin/skey ) selinux? ( sys-libs/libselinux )" DEPEND="${DEPEND} solar@gentoo.org 2004-11-25 07:39:07 0000 InCVS Looks good from native uclibc(-pam) and native glibc(+pam) envs. changing resolution to FIXED solar@gentoo.org 2004-11-26 15:37:15 0000 *** Bug 72411 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** greg_g@gentoo.org 2004-11-27 15:40:43 0000 Now we have: shadow-4.0.x.ebuild: RDEPEND="... pam? ( >=sys-libs/pam-0.75-r4 sys-apps/pam-login ) ..." pam-login-3.14.ebuild: DEPEND="... >=sys-apps/shadow-4.0.2-r5 ..." It seems a bad thing, shouldn't one of them be PDEPEND? vapier@gentoo.org 2004-11-29 17:15:41 0000 pam-login doesnt really require shadow ... removed it from pam-login's DEPEND cslycord@gmail.com 2006-03-13 19:02:28 0000 (In reply to comment #12) > pam-login doesnt really require shadow ... removed it from pam-login's DEPEND > sys-apps/pam-login-4.0.14 requires >=sys-apps/shadow-4.0.11.1-r1 sys-apps/shadow-4.0.14-r2 requires !sys-apps/pam-login So you can't install pam-login without shadow and you can't install shadow with pam-login. cslycord@gmail.com 2006-03-13 19:09:35 0000 If you look at the DEPEND in shadow-4.0.14-r1 it says !pam? ( !sys-apps/pam-login ) And in shadow-4.0.14-r2 it instead just says !sys-apps/pam-login Just to make it clear; the blocking issue only comes up starting with shadow version 4.0.14-r2 solar@gentoo.org 2006-03-13 19:23:15 0000 Did you also happen to read the ChangeLog entry? franke.daniel@gmail.com 2006-05-31 23:56:12 0000 From comment #14: > And in shadow-4.0.14-r2 it instead just says > !sys-apps/pam-login So it does in shadow-4.0.15-r2.ebuild that recently was marked stable. Now sys-apps/pam-login blocks the update of 'system' -- a system I used (and updated successfully) for months. Suggestions how to proceed? solar@gentoo.org 2006-06-02 04:06:29 0000 (In reply to comment #16) .. > Suggestions how to proceed? This is not really the right bug.. But you simply want to. emerge -C pam-login && emerge shadow