67460 2004-10-13 14:04 0000 VDKBuilder 2.0.2 builds VDK lib, not VDK builder 2005-04-15 07:10:03 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Development unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 johan.verrept@advalvas.be gustavoz@gentoo.org johan.verrept@advalvas.be 2004-10-13 14:04:45 0000 The vdkbuilder 2.0.2 ebuild builds the VDK lib, not VDKBuilder. This seems solved for later versions. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2004-10-13 19:02:59 0000 I think I'm going to simply remove this. I've upgraded VDK lib/builder to the latest version. Basically what happened is that at around 2.0.2, the vdk lib and vdkbuilder teams split their source. There's now vdk.sourceforge.net and vdkbuilder.sourceforge.net. I felt I should at least bump the ebuilds though.. as they were horribly out of date :). One more thing though: sparc team: the only thing that's preventing removal of 2.0.2 is that it's the only stable sparc build you guys have. this was stable marked wayyyyyyy long ago by: manson@gentoo.org who I don't see as an active dev anymore. 2.0.3 is stable on x86, so you might wish to give that a try. 2.4.0 is the latest unstable, but I haven't had a chance to truly test it. A good test case that I can think of is to follow the vdkbuilder tutorials on the vdkbuilder site and make sure that everything works ok. Thanks ahead of time. gustavoz@gentoo.org 2004-10-18 15:07:42 0000 Keyworded vdkbuilder-2.4.0 ~sparc. 2.0.3 doesn't even build. Other sparc devs: we should aim 2.4.0 to stable if chris is ok with it. Haven't tried 2.0.5 but i have that gut feeling it won't build. gustavoz@gentoo.org 2004-11-01 14:09:20 0000 dev-libs/vdk-2.4.0 & dev-util/vdkbuilder-2.4.0 sparc stable. seemant@gentoo.org 2005-04-11 10:02:33 0000 gus you want this, since chris is no longer a dev? gustavoz@gentoo.org 2005-04-15 07:10:03 0000 Bumped vdk & vdkbuilder 2.4.0 to x86 stable. This should fix the issues.