<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>61828</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-08-26 09:37 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>RFE: gparted</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-07-07 03:25:57 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://gparted.sourceforge.net/</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>61857</dependson>
    
    <dependson>68854</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>unit3@demoni.ca</reporter>
          <assigned_to>blubb@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>basic@mozdev.org</cc>
    
    <cc>brad@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ed@catmur.co.uk</cc>
    
    <cc>ewajacobs@home.nl</cc>
    
    <cc>frederic.grosshans_web@m4x.org</cc>
    
    <cc>gnome@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>henrik@brixandersen.dk</cc>
    
    <cc>kkrizka@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>murray.alex@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-08-26 09:37:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just requesting an ebuild for gparted, the GNOME alternative to qtparted. If I have time, I&apos;ll make one myself. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-08-26 12:53:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>well, afaik it&apos;s pretty alpha &amp; we need an updated libparted (preferably with the patch on the gparted homepage) before it can even be considered. Please open a bug for parted-1.6.12 &amp; make it block this one.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-08-26 14:22:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Alright, done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-07 07:58:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>gparted is now at version 0.0.4.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-07 09:37:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=39132)
simple gparted-0.0.4 ebuild

Here&apos;s a really simple ebuild for gparted 0.0.4 that depends on the parted
1.6.14 ebuild in the blocking bug listed above. It loads up and displays fine,
but I haven&apos;t had time to test any actual partition resizing / moving.

If people could help me with testing it, I would greatly appreciate it. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mgtroyas@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-09 07:19:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I tried the ebuild and worked flawlessly. Why should the KDE users have a parted-based GUI and the Gnome users don&apos;t? LOL

Looking forward to using this instead of Partiton Magic :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-09 07:49:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marcos: I&apos;m glad that my hack-job ebuilds have had some success. ;)

However, could you clarify if you actually used the emerged gparted to resize any partitions? If so, can you also let us know what filesystem type they were?  I just want to verify that someone has actually /used/ the app successfully, since I /still/ haven&apos;t had time to test it myself. :P</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-30 15:51:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just a personal reminder, gparted 0.0.5 is out, with bugfixes, speed increases, and some sort of internationalization. I&apos;ll get around to posting an updated ebuild sometime soon-ish. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-12 01:53:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>FYI: sys-apps/parted-1.6.15 was added to portage 25 Sep 2004.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>won@home.nl</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-14 00:18:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;d be happy to try your ebuild. But i was just wondering, do i have to create the Manifest etc. myself? I don&apos;t want to sound lazy but i&apos;d like to know what the standard way of doing this is.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-14 07:57:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ramon: No harm in asking questions. :)  The standard way (after you&apos;ve copied the ebuild to somewhere under /usr/local/portage, or wherever your local portage tree resides) is to just run &quot;ebuild foo.ebuild digest&quot;. That will generate all the manifest and digest files for you, based on the source files it has downloaded. If it hasn&apos;t downloaded any source files yet, it will retrieve them, and then make a digest. :)

In any case, I plan to have a 0.0.5 ebuild out shortly, so you might want to wait a couple of hours for that one. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-14 09:01:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=41807)
gparted 0.0.5 ebuild

Seems to run alright. I made it depend on at least parted*.15 (as mentioned in
a previous comment), so it should have the latest and greatest parted features.
:)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>won@home.nl</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-17 04:57:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, the 0.0.5 ebuild emerges just fine. I found out i actually had &quot;bad&quot; partition table and i seem unable to delete a (ext2) partition even when it&apos;s unmounted. Bug or feature? Resizing seems impossible for all partitions

The important thing is, it works and looks pretty slick already :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-17 13:50:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Heh, I wouldn&apos;t call &quot;no resizing&quot; working. ;)

However, since all of that is supplied to gparted via libparted, that seems to me like it&apos;s libparted bugs, not gparted ones. It told me I had an invalid ext2 partition as well, even though the previous version had no problems with it, so I&apos;m inclined to believe there are bugs at work here. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-17 14:04:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>libparted&apos;s ext2/3 code isn&apos;t really compatible with the newest e2fstools. Please send mails about this to bug-parted@gnu.org to convince Andrew to fix this. According to him it&apos;s a relative easy fix. But for us mere mortals it&apos;d take weeks only to understand that code (not even fix it) :P</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 09:20:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>New (0.0.6) version of GParted out. I&apos;ll have an updated ebuild shortly. This version adds support for reiserfs stuff, but its via progreiserfs (namesys&apos; alternate reiserfs tools), and there doesn&apos;t seem to be an ebuild for that yet. I&apos;m going to make a bug requesting an ebuild for that, then have this bug be blocked by that one. Once there&apos;s an ebuild for progreiserfs (ie, once I get around to making one! ;) ), then I&apos;ll add a USE flag to gparted&apos;s ebuild to enable optional use of it.

At least, that&apos;s my plan. Any comments on it would be appreciated. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 09:44:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>bleh, progsreiserfs is horribly broken apparently, so we&apos;ll just ignore that functionality for now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 10:53:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Graeme, can you be a bit more specific about the problems you encounter when making an ebuild for progsreiserfs?

thnks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 11:52:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>My work on that is on bug 68854, which references bug 51773. What I discovered is that at one point, there already were progsreiserfs ebuilds, and they were discontinued due to instability and lack of maintainence (&quot;But the last one (0.3.1rc8) is from 12-Dec-2002 - seems to be a dead project.&quot;).

Until the Gentoo core developers decide that they wish to reintroduce this piece of software, it&apos;s not really my place to try and force it to be reintroduced.

I figure that if there&apos;s enough demand, then the Gentoo core devs will reconsider the way its masked now. At that point, we can add it as a dep of this package. In the mean time, we don&apos;t lose any functionality in gparted by /not/ having it.

On another point, I&apos;ve noticed that the current reiserfsprogs stable package ( 3.6.18) on my system /includes/ a tool called resize_reiserfs, which apparently does what you&apos;d expect. Perhaps it would be more prudent for gparted to make use of this, rather than the apparently discontinued progsreiserfs stuff?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 12:08:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i agree, if it was up to me i would&apos;ve used the &apos;official&apos; reisersfsprogs. Hoewever, as you can see at http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/#features this is not a gparted thingy, but a &apos;feature&apos; from parted. Thus it seemed logical to enable it in gparted.

Maybe (most likely) i&apos;ll change this in the future, right now i have other matters  to attend to (like adding ntfs support).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 14:20:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ahhh, I see how these all fit together now. Parted just gets this feature if libreiserfs is present on the system when it&apos;s being built...

Ok, well, I can&apos;t do much about getting progsreiserfs into Gentoo, so this feature will have to stay off for a while in the Gentoo package. :(

OTOH, if you get a system in place to do ntfs stuff using the commandline tools, perhaps we could organize doing the same with the reiserfs tools? Obviously, this&apos;d be quite a bit farther down the road, but still, it might be a good option. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 15:34:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Re: comment 14. I&apos;ve talked with one of the parted guys, and the synopsis is that &quot;yes, libparted doesn&apos;t support the newest ext2/3 features, no, we don&apos;t have time to fix it at the moment&quot;. The other little tidbit of advice I got about it was this:

&quot;One might convert ext3 to ext2 and disable all features (man tune2fs) then
use parted then convert it back to ext3, features enabled. Running e2fsck
during these shouldn&apos;t be forgotten and makeing full backup before doing
these.&quot;

So, that&apos;d be yet another commandline-tool hack, which I imagine gparted&apos;s auther isn&apos;t really interested in doing, at least at the moment. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nzgreen@operamail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-25 17:36:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=42587)
gparted-0.0.6.ebuild

This is Graeme&apos;s 0.0.5 ebuild with a src_unpack function.  The file I
downloaded unpacks to a directory called gparted, not gparted-0.0.6.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-26 00:40:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Re: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61828#c20&quot;&gt;comment 20&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s not strictly necessary to have progsreiserfs on your system when building parted/gparted. If you install it later, it&apos;ll be detected at runtime and used properly.

Finally a bit of good news =)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-26 07:59:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Re: comment 22. Ha! Yes, I actually made one myself yesterday, and then I got caught up in sorting out this reiserfs/parted stuff, and forgot to actually attach it! My bad! ;)

Re: comment 23: That&apos;s excellent news. That means that there doesn&apos;t need to be any specific reference in the Gentoo package... people are free to make a simple ebuild and install progsreiserfs if they really want that functionality, and it should Just Work(tm) with their existing (g)parted install.

Now, to get NTFS stuff working. ;)  I may have time to actually help with that, so I&apos;ll see you on IRC.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cjouny@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-26 11:22:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>0.0.6 compiles on amd64. keywords ~amd64 could be added. I did my own ebuild (saw this one only after). Almost same except you don&apos;t need to move directory, just use :

S=&quot;${WORKDIR}/${PN}&quot;

then a regular :
src_compile() {
        econf --prefix=/usr || die &quot;configuration failed&quot;
        emake || die &quot;emake failed&quot;
}

I did not include my ebuild as with mine gparted failed to show in menu. Not sure why...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gruemel-monster@gmx.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-05 14:55:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>New version of gparted available (see: http://gparted.sourceforge.net/news.php)
Lots of improvements (ext2/3, NTFS, reisefs...)

Could anyone of you please make an ebuild?? I just can not of yet ;-)
(I promise i will learn;-))

Thanx in advance</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 00:09:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i think copying the 0.0.6 ebuild to gparted-0.0.7.ebuild will work.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 10:02:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That may work, but we&apos;ll probably want to massage the dependancies a bit, so that it will default to install all the necessary commandline tools to get maximum functionality.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 10:17:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ok, but maybe it&apos;s best to add some useflags. Wether they are disabled by default or not isn&apos;t that important as long as the user is able to control stuff.

Are you on this one Graeme or should i volunteer? ;) 

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 11:13:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Heh, I&apos;ll do it, if you have a list of all the external programs that gparted depends on these days. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 11:26:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>no have plors do it, as an exercise.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-06 11:31:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Haha, you heard the man, Bart! Get on it! ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-07 13:48:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=45466)
gparted-0.0.7.ebuild
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-07 13:51:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hmm, i guess some explanation would be in place :)
No useflags since that would introduce 3 (and later on even more) useflags to gentoo.
No hard deps on the different progs like ntfsprogs etc.. because that would cause a lot of unnecessary bloat.

If people need support for a specific filesystem they have to merge the proper tool and GParted will detect and use it.

I know it&apos;s not perfect, but i think it&apos;s the best we can do atm...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>r2d2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-11 12:56:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Introduction of useflags should not be a problem as they would be local useflags, specific to given packages. While I&apos;d generally assume someone wanting a partitioning tool will like lots of functionality, I can imagine someone not wanting support for stuff they will never touch.

I think local use flags would be the way to go.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-22 03:56:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=46619)
gparted-0.0.8.ebuild

simple copy of gparted-0.0.7.ebuild.

@Robert:
Personally i don&apos;t care that much whether we use useflags or not, but some
people like to limit the amount of useflags gentoo already has.

In this case they&apos;re not necessary either since gparted treats the tools like
plugins. If they are installed, gparted uses them. if not, some options will be
unavailable. 
See also http://gparted.sourceforge.net/features.php
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gad.kadosh@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-04 23:13:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>why is gparted not officially included in portage?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-05 07:27:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Good question, Gad! :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gad.kadosh@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-09 01:23:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thx!
what about the answer ? :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>unit3@demoni.ca</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-09 17:34:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hahahaha, well, I&apos;m not an official Gentoo developer, so I really wouldn&apos;t know. Foser&apos;d probably be the one to ask, but the usual answer (ie, that the Gentoo developers really busy all the time) is probably the correct one. ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gparted@users.sf.net</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-10 01:50:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, i asked foser about it and it seems noone has time to maintain it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-17 10:10:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>plors is going to maintain it, so you have to poke him about becoming a dev faster.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-23 05:00:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>plors&apos; devrel-bug is RESOLVED LATER :/ foser, would you mind if i step up as
maintainer till plors is a dev? i like this tool, and it seems that many others
want it in portage too. i was quite astonished when emerge said it can&apos;t find
gparted :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-23 05:54:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>fine with me, plors can be found in IRC if you need him.

I overheard there&apos;s an interesting bounty addition not yet in the source ;)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-23 11:19:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>finally in portage: sys-block/gparted</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>39132</attachid>
            <date>2004-09-07 09:37 0000</date>
            <desc>simple gparted-0.0.4 ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gparted-0.0.4.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k
ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk
ZXI6ICQKCkRFU0NSSVBUSU9OPSJHTk9NRSBwYXJ0ZWQgR1VJIgpIT01FUEFHRT0iaHR0cDovL2dw
YXJ0ZWQuc291cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0LyIKClNSQ19VUkk9Im1pcnJvcjovL3NvdXJjZWZvcmdlL2dw
YXJ0ZWQvJHtQfS50YXIuYnoyIgoKTElDRU5TRT0iR1BMIgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4
NiIKCkRFUEVORD0iPj1wYXJ0ZWQtMS42LjE0Cgk+PWd0a21tLTIuNC4wIgoKc3JjX2NvbXBpbGUo
KSB7CgllY29uZiB8fCBkaWUKCWVtYWtlIHx8IGRpZSAiZW1ha2UgZmFpbGVkIgp9CgpzcmNfaW5z
dGFsbCgpIHsKCWVpbnN0YWxsIHx8IGRpZSAiZWluc3RhbGwgZmFpbGVkIgp9Cg==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>41807</attachid>
            <date>2004-10-14 09:01 0000</date>
            <desc>gparted 0.0.5 ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gparted-0.0.5.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k
ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk
ZXI6ICQKCkRFU0NSSVBUSU9OPSJHTk9NRSBwYXJ0ZWQgR1VJIgpIT01FUEFHRT0iaHR0cDovL2dw
YXJ0ZWQuc291cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0LyIKClNSQ19VUkk9Im1pcnJvcjovL3NvdXJjZWZvcmdlL2dw
YXJ0ZWQvJHtQfS50YXIuYnoyIgoKTElDRU5TRT0iR1BMIgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4
NiIKCkRFUEVORD0iPj1wYXJ0ZWQtMS42LjE1Cgk+PWd0a21tLTIuNC4wIgoKc3JjX2NvbXBpbGUo
KSB7CgllY29uZiB8fCBkaWUKCWVtYWtlIHx8IGRpZSAiZW1ha2UgZmFpbGVkIgp9CgpzcmNfaW5z
dGFsbCgpIHsKCWVpbnN0YWxsIHx8IGRpZSAiZWluc3RhbGwgZmFpbGVkIgp9Cg==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>42587</attachid>
            <date>2004-10-25 17:36 0000</date>
            <desc>gparted-0.0.6.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gparted-0.0.6.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>45466</attachid>
            <date>2004-12-07 13:48 0000</date>
            <desc>gparted-0.0.7.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gparted-0.0.7.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k
ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk
ZXI6ICQKCmluaGVyaXQgZ25vbWUyCgpERVNDUklQVElPTj0iR25vbWUgUGFydGl0aW9uIEVkaXRv
ciIKSE9NRVBBR0U9Imh0dHA6Ly9ncGFydGVkLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldC8iCgpTUkNfVVJJPSJt
aXJyb3I6Ly9zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS9ncGFydGVkLyR7UH0udGFyLmJ6MiIKCkxJQ0VOU0U9IkdQTC0y
IgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4NiB+YW1kNjQiCklVU0U9IiIKClJERVBFTkQ9Ij49cGFy
dGVkLTEuNi4xMwogICAgICAgID49Z3RrbW0tMi40LjAiCgpERVBFTkQ9IiR7UkRFUEVORH0KICAg
ICAgICA+PWRldi11dGlsL3BrZ2NvbmZpZy0wLjEyCiAgICAgICAgPj1kZXYtdXRpbC9pbnRsdG9v
bC0wLjI5IgoJCQkJCQkK
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>46619</attachid>
            <date>2004-12-22 03:56 0000</date>
            <desc>gparted-0.0.8.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>gparted-0.0.8.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k
ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk
ZXI6ICQKCmluaGVyaXQgZ25vbWUyCgpERVNDUklQVElPTj0iR25vbWUgUGFydGl0aW9uIEVkaXRv
ciIKSE9NRVBBR0U9Imh0dHA6Ly9ncGFydGVkLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldC8iCgpTUkNfVVJJPSJt
aXJyb3I6Ly9zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS9ncGFydGVkLyR7UH0udGFyLmJ6MiIKCkxJQ0VOU0U9IkdQTC0y
IgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4NiB+YW1kNjQiCklVU0U9IiIKClJERVBFTkQ9Ij49cGFy
dGVkLTEuNi4xMwogICAgICAgID49Z3RrbW0tMi40LjAiCgpERVBFTkQ9IiR7UkRFUEVORH0KICAg
ICAgICA+PWRldi11dGlsL3BrZ2NvbmZpZy0wLjEyCiAgICAgICAgPj1kZXYtdXRpbC9pbnRsdG9v
bC0wLjI5IgoJCQkJCQkK
</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>