<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>60883</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-08-19 05:00 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>cdrecord from cdrtools is not gpl (it has an extra restriction)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-09-02 17:17:34 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Unspecified</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr</reporter>
          <assigned_to>pylon@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>polynomial-c@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2004-08-19 05:00:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The file cdrecord/cdrecord.c has the following exrtra restriction (line 4640):

/*   
 * You are not allowed to modify or remove the following code.   
 * I am sorry that I am forced to do things like this, but defective   
 * versions of cdrecord cause a lot of work load to me and it seems   
 * to be impossible to otherwise convince SuSE to cooperate.   
 * As people contact me and bother me with the related problems,   
 * it is obvious that SuSE is violating subsection 6 in the preamble of   
 * the GPL.   
 *   
 * Note that although the SuSE test is effective only for SuSE, the   
 * intention to have non bastardized versions out is not limited   
 * to SuSE. It is bad to see that in special in the &quot;Linux&quot; business,   
 * companies prefer a model with many proprietary differing programs   
 * instead of cooperating with the program authors.   
 */

this extra restriction make cdrecord non gpl. maybe the licence in the ebuild should be updated.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2004-08-19 05:01:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i forgot to say that this applies on versions 2.01a36</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pylon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-02 17:17:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I already added a comment to the ebuild.  Obviously I forgot to close this bug.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>