<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>58699</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-07-28 14:45 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>media-libs/tiff-3.5.7-r1 does not install &quot;private&quot; headers</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-04 07:35:39 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>NEEDINFO</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>award@dominionsciences.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>graphics@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>eva@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>jakub@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>award@dominionsciences.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-28 14:45:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>While writing an ebuild for spandsp (www.opencall.org), I found that media-libs/tiff was not installing two headers I needed: tiffiop.h and tiff_dir.h. It looks like the tiff ebuild needs to &quot;make install-private&quot; rather than &quot;make install&quot; to get the headers I need. I don&apos;t know if this should be governed by a USE-flag or not, so I&apos;ll defer to a dev&apos;s judgement.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>langthang@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-28 15:14:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is not net-mail bug. Send it back to bug-wranglers...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nerdboy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-16 23:28:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added local USE flag &quot;private&quot; to tiff 3.5.7-r2.  Give it a whirl</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>award@dominionsciences.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-20 14:00:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Looks good, and works for me. I&apos;d vote for this to be unmasked.

Also, please make sure this change is applied to the current 3.6.x version that&apos;s masked in portage. Looking ahead, I see the same issue still applies. Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nerdboy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-12 15:11:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The tiff 3.7.0 fixes the nagging bugs in 3.6.x and seems to be working well.  I&apos;m 
not sure how much else changed in 3.7.0, but I think the private-header thing is 
still the same.  I&apos;m trying to push the 3.7.0 to stable so can you live with the 
fix appplied there?  I&apos;d like to remove the broken 3.6 stuff if possible...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>award@dominionsciences.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-11-15 13:01:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>There is no fix here. In fact, this has regressed since 3.5.7-r2 -- 3.6.1-r2 is broken as-is. Perhaps the addition of &quot;make install-private&quot; never made it to 3.6 or 3.7 in the first place?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-27 16:50:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>What&apos;s the status here?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>award@dominionsciences.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-27 20:14:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I haven&apos;t looked at this in quite some time, and glancing at the tiff
distribution, I&apos;m not sure what&apos;s going on upstream. There&apos;s a masked ebuild for
spandsp which I don&apos;t have time to test right now, but building spandsp (prior
to the official ebuild) is how I ran across the problem originally.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>eva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-13 21:24:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>What&apos;s the status here ? Is this bug solved with tiff 3.8 ?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>award@dominionsciences.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-14 20:56:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>My Gentoo system is offline and out of my control for now. Sorry. :-(
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>eva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-04 03:01:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>given that this version is not in tree anymore and that the reporter cannot give more information for now, I suggest to close this bug and reopen it latter if there is more info.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-04 07:35:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Reporter response needed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>