<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>58634</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-07-28 01:52 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>pkg add request: net-proxy/ntlmaps</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-07-13 00:44:23 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Release Media</product>
          <component>Everything</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>InSVN</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>64113</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>satya@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>release@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>satya@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-28 01:52:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This can resolve the inhability to connect to internet if inside a lan with a MsProxy server as gateway, which doesn&apos;t accept standard digest auth. No matter what you set in *proxy env vars.
ntlmaps is a local proxy server able to authenticate via samba protocol with MsProxy server, thus permitting full internet installation process. Size: around 200k with docs. Depends: python sockets only.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-28 07:10:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ll look into it, but we remove python from the livecd environment, so you&apos;re not talking about adding 200K to the CD, but adding *python* and 200K.  That&apos;s quite a difference.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-14 15:59:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I have added this to my spec files and we&apos;ll see how it goes... I&apos;ll keep you informed via this bug...

Are you sure this doesn&apos;t require samba or anything extra?

Also, would you open a bug to have ntlmaps checked on any other arches?  This would need to be stable on any arch that would use it for it to be included properly.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-15 04:14:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I haven&apos;t any machine without samba to test this on now, but reading some code I found complete raw samba auth network functions (also, when I last checked I&apos;m sure I didn&apos;t need samba installed to use this pkg).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-15 04:15:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>adding bug for arch test request</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-15 05:45:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Excellent.

I am manually unmasking this package in my portage snapshot for x86 and amd64 (the two arches I&apos;m working with)...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-15 23:30:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is still masked on x86 and amd64, I know.  The snapshot date is the 20th of October, so it would either need to be in stable for each arch that needs it, or it&apos;ll get left off the CD.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-10-21 22:03:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>There is dante on the LiveCD as distfiles... this didn&apos;t make deadline, so it won&apos;t make it on 2004.3&apos;s release.  REOPEN if it goes stable on any arch and we&apos;ll include it on the LiveCD.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-22 12:14:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-22 12:14:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I guess we can shoot for 2007.0 on this one.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-25 18:09:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Is there anything stopping this from going stable on amd64/ppc?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-28 20:23:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, I went and marked this stable on amd64/hppa/ppc for 2008.0&apos;s release.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>agaffney@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-13 00:44:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This was fixed for 2008.0</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>