56809 2004-07-12 11:10 0000 the ebuild for latex-unicode can benefit more from USE=cjk 2004-08-18 07:36:59 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications 2004.1 All All RESOLVED FIXED P2 enhancement --- 1 chutz@gg3.net text-markup@gentoo.org chutz@gg3.net 2004-07-12 11:10:49 0000 My original complain is that the ebuild for dev-tex/latex-unicode is plain horrible (but that is just my opinion). The frustration is partly due to the fact that I don't know what the mainter did to prepare the package as it is. Furthermore, in the USE=-cjk case, the makeunidef.pl script in the original script can benefit from "--exclude cjkbg5,cjkgb,cjkjis,cjkhangul", which leads to the exclusion and non-compilation of a few megabytes of data for the -cjk users. At least that is what I used in my local overlay (mostly because I didn't realise the package is already in portage). I don't know why that choice was made, so I'd like to either hear the justification behind it or see a new ebuild if possible. I really believe that nobody benefits from the ebuild in its current form. usata@gentoo.org 2004-07-13 09:03:35 0000 Sorry about your frustration. I put latex-unicode into Portaeg but haven't tested much (cause I don't use Unicode for LaTeX). If you are uncomfortable with the package and you have a better one, please submit it here. I'm not happy with the current cjk USE flag for this package as we are moving towards better handling for multilingual environment (bug #9988). Probably it's better to use LINGUAS solution for the moment. In addition to latex-unicode, there's an open bug for cjk-latex (bug #40354) but I don't have much time to fix it. I planned to take some patches from SUSE (anyway, jmgolv will take care of it). chutz@gg3.net 2004-07-13 17:06:30 0000 Created an attachment (id=35358) latex-unicode.ebuild Well, this package is pretty useful as a part of the movement to utf8. This way, I can write my latex files in utf8, though I haven't used it with Japanese yet. In fact, the CJK part is pretty ugly, according to languages.ps.gz. The message in the end of the original latex-unicode ebuild was pretty useful. If you are to consider my ebuild, I'd recommend keeping the original message. One problem with the ebuild, is that the file in SRC_URI is not versioned. chutz@gg3.net 2004-07-13 17:08:59 0000 I now see that my ebuild ignores ${myconf}. Trivial to patch. < perl makeunidef.pl -t data -v --nocomments config/* || die > perl makeunidef.pl -t data -v --nocomments ${myconf} config/* || die usata@gentoo.org 2004-07-17 11:14:11 0000 I tested your ebuild and it didn't work with Japanese. It cannot find c40enc.def. I had tested several examples with my ebuild according to languages.pz when I committed. Could you provide some tex files that your ebuild is able to process and Portage's isn't? If cjk USE flag is the only thing I'll add it to the current ebuild. chutz@gg3.net 2004-07-17 12:11:00 0000 Not sure how to apologize. I read the INSTALL and the README, which referenced an extra required file, plus compilation steps. Then I looked at your ebuild, and I saw that you've listed only one file, that the file is on a private server, and that that you don't do any of the things that are listed in the README. So I figured that you've prepared the file yourself, because the ebuild didn't do any of the "compile" steps that the README talks about. Hence all the confusion. About the cjk use flag: excluding cjk reduces the size of data/ from 2.2M to 782K... not really an issue for someone using latex. Sorry again. Might as well mark this as inavlid, but I'd rather go hide under a pillow. Actually, if you do want to include the IUSE=cjk... the source tarball seems to already be prepared with all possible encodings. I guess only the -cjk case can be prepared again: src_compile() { if ! use cjk ; then rm -f data/* perl makeunidef.pl -t data -v --nocomments --exclude cjkbg5,cjkgb,cjkjis,cjkhangul config/* fi } usata@gentoo.org 2004-08-18 07:36:59 0000 Sorry fot the delay. Applied your patch to latex-unicode-20040307.ebuild. Thanks for the suggestion. If you find any other improvements please let me know. 35358 2004-07-13 17:06 0000 latex-unicode.ebuild latex-ucs-0.1.ebuild text/plain IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMsIEluYy4KIyBEaXN0cmli dXRlZCB1bmRlciB0aGUgdGVybXMgb2YgdGhlIEdOVSBHZW5lcmFsIFB1YmxpYyBMaWNlbnNlIHYy CiMgJEhlYWRlcjogJAoKaW5oZXJpdCBsYXRleC1wYWNrYWdlCkRFU0NSSVBUSU9OPSJVbmljb2Rl IHN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIGxhdGV4IgpIT01FUEFHRT0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy51bnJ1aC5kZS9EbmlRL2xh dGV4L3VuaWNvZGUvdW5pY29kZS50Z3oiClNSQ19VUkk9IgoJaHR0cDovL3d3dy51bnJ1aC5kZS9E bmlRL2xhdGV4L3VuaWNvZGUvdW5pY29kZS50Z3oKCWh0dHA6Ly93d3cudW5pY29kZS5vcmcvUHVi bGljL1VOSURBVEEvVW5pY29kZURhdGEudHh0CgkiCkxJQ0VOU0U9ImxhdGV4IgpTTE9UPSIwIgpL RVlXT1JEUz0ifng4NiIKSVVTRT0iY2prIgpERVBFTkQ9InZpcnR1YWwvdGV0ZXggZGV2LWxhbmcv cGVybCIKUkRFUEVORD0idmlydHVhbC90ZXRleCIKUz0iJHtXT1JLRElSfS91Y3MiCgpzcmNfdW5w YWNrKCkgewoJdW5wYWNrIHVuaWNvZGUudGd6CgljcCAke0RJU1RESVJ9L1VuaWNvZGVEYXRhLnR4 dCAke1N9Cn0KCnNyY19jb21waWxlKCkgewoJbG9jYWwgbXljb25mCgl1c2UgY2prIHx8IG15Y29u Zj0iJHtteWNvbmZ9IC0tZXhjbHVkZSBjamtiZzUsY2prZ2IsY2pramlzLGNqa2hhbmd1bCIKCXBl cmwgbWFrZXVuaWRlZi5wbCAtdCBkYXRhIC12IC0tbm9jb21tZW50cyBjb25maWcvKiB8fCBkaWUK fQoKc3JjX2luc3RhbGwoKSB7CglkZXN0PSR7VEVYTUZ9L3RleC9sYXRleC8ke1BOfQoJZG9kaXIg JHtkZXN0fS9kYXRhCglpbnNpbnRvICR7ZGVzdH0vZGF0YQoJZG9pbnMgZGF0YS8qCglpbnNpbnRv ICR7ZGVzdH0KCWRvaW5zICouc3R5ICouZGVmCglkb2RvYyBGQVEgSU5TVEFMTCBMSUNFTlNFIFZF UlNJT04gUkVBRE1FIHVjcy5wcy5neiBsYW5ndWFnZXMucHMuZ3oKfQo=