55176 2004-06-25 10:58 0000 aquafont-2.7-r1 & aquapfont-2.5-r1 ebuilds appear broken 2004-07-05 00:11:25 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Unspecified unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 hollywoodb@fastmail.fm fonts@gentoo.org hollywoodb@fastmail.fm 2004-06-25 10:58:29 0000 I'm unable to use aquafont-2.7-r1 and aquapfont-2.5-r1... 2.7 & 2.5 work like a charm, but the ebuild appears to be broken with -r1. looking at the ebuilds, they only have a src_unpack function... no src_install and such... I notice a few other differences, but my font knowlegde is limited so I'm not going to jump in & butcher these ebuilds :) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge =media-fonts/aquafont-2.7-r1 2. emerge =media-fonts/aquapfont-2.5-r1 3. usata@gentoo.org 2004-06-25 12:37:47 0000 Thanks for the bug report. I bumped aquafont to 2.7-r2 to fix the bug. However, I cannot confirm aquapfont-2.5-r1 is broken. Could you describe more about the bug, please? >=aquafont-2.7-r1 and >=aquapfont-2.5-r1 use font.eclass and src_install() is defined in that eclass. Have a look at /usr/portage/eclass/font.eclass to see what it is actually doing. hollywoodb@fastmail.fm 2004-06-26 11:00:58 0000 actually aquapont-2.5-r1 appears to be OK, I mistook the differences between the two and initially thought them both to be broken... aquafont-2.7-r2 works well here :) thanks hollywoodb@fastmail.fm 2004-06-26 11:09:46 0000 I do get these errors during the aquapfont-2.5-r1 & aquafont-2.7-r2 emerges: /usr/lib/portage/bin/dodoc: COPYRIGHT does not exist. /usr/lib/portage/bin/dodoc: README does not exist. /usr/lib/portage/bin/dodoc: NEWS does not exist. usata@gentoo.org 2004-07-05 00:11:25 0000 Fixed in CVS. Thanks for the bug report.