<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>54439</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-06-19 11:27 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>dictd-wn-2.0.ebuild</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-07-25 07:58:04 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=185947</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>lists.sridhar@dhanapalan.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>app-dicts@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lists.sridhar@dhanapalan.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-06-19 11:27:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is an ebuild for WordNet 2.0 for dictd. The current version in Portage is quite old. Note that this ebuild is _not_ the same as the one submitted in Bug #34957 (which is for standalone WordNet, not the dictd version).

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lists.sridhar@dhanapalan.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-06-19 11:28:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=33578)
dictd-wn-2.0.ebuild
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>liquidx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-24 12:51:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thanks for your submission. its been added to portage now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>l_indien@magic.fr</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-25 03:41:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This package is broken on amd64:
[ebuild     U ] app-dicts/dictd-wn-2.0 [1.5-r1]  0 kB 

/# emerge -b --update --verbose =app-dicts/dictd-wn-2.0                                             
Calculating dependencies ...done!
&gt;&gt;&gt; emerge (1 of 2) app-dicts/dictd-wn-2.0 to /
&gt;&gt;&gt; md5 src_uri ;-) dict-wn-2.0.tar.gz
&gt;&gt;&gt; Unpacking source...
&gt;&gt;&gt; Unpacking dict-wn-2.0.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/dictd-wn-2.0/work
&gt;&gt;&gt; Source unpacked.
Configuring for dict-wn
.
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linuxoldld&apos;: machine `x86_64-unknown&apos; not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linuxoldld failed

I&apos;m using testing version of Gentoo for amd64.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>liquidx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-07-25 07:58:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>could you please file another bug about that please? thanks. for the moment i&apos;m taking out the amd64 keyword</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>33578</attachid>
            <date>2004-06-19 11:28 0000</date>
            <desc>dictd-wn-2.0.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>dictd-wn-2.0.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDAzIEdlbnRvbyBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMsIEluYy4KIyBEaXN0cmli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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>