<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>53971</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-06-15 06:16 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild (New Package)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-07-17 13:06:51 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>EBUILD</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>linux-user@arcor.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>base-system@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jim@bugs.gentoo.org.dabell.name</cc>
    
    <cc>jochen.eisinger@gmx.de</cc>
    
    <cc>linux-user@arcor.de</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>linux-user@arcor.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-06-15 06:16:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hi!

My scanner (CanoScan FB620P =&gt; sane canon_pp) didn&apos;t work under gentoo (but under debian).
I saw, that gentoo use libieee1284-0.2.1 and debian libieee1284.0.2.8.

The problem is that canon-parport-scanner (especially all devices that use the canon_pp) doesn&apos;t work under gentoo. But with a new libieee1284 version the scanner works fine.
So I wrote (I never wrote a ebuild bevor. I use the old ebuild from 0.2.1) a libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild.
http://cyberelk.net/tim/libieee1284/

- tux2</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>linux-user@arcor.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-06-15 06:19:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=33310)
libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild (New version)
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jochen.eisinger@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-09-02 05:49:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>there&apos;s even 0.2.9r2 marked as &quot;stable&quot; meanwhile... any progress integrating that ebuild in gentoo?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jim@bugs.gentoo.org.dabell.name</who>
            <bug_when>2004-12-13 11:02:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This bug affects me also.  0.2.8 is enough to make my scanner work, with the current 0.2.1, it&apos;s utterly useless.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>robbat2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-01-16 14:49:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>marking as a dupe of 75119 as that has some new patches.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 75119 ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>33310</attachid>
            <date>2004-06-15 06:19 0000</date>
            <desc>libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild (New version)</desc>
            <filename>libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMsIEluYy4KIyBEaXN0cmli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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>