<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>48123</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-04-17 06:07 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-firewall/kmyfirewall: missing dependency, broken version 0.9.6</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-04-19 02:50:40 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>zenith@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>dragonheart@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zenith@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-17 06:07:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The kmyfirewall package depends on net-firewall/iptables, but this dependency is not enforced.

Furthermore, kmyfirewall 0.9.6 has not yet been removed nor masked, though its behaviour is known to be broken on Gentoo. 0.9.6.2 is patched specially for this.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zenith@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-17 06:10:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=29486)
Patch for portage ebuild for kmyfirewall.0.9.6.2

Enforces runtime dependency on iptables.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-17 19:24:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thanks - fixed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zenith@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-18 03:12:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Thanks for being quick, but there&apos;s yet a problem - all versions of kmyfirewall depend on iptables, while I&apos;ve seen in portage that only 0.9.6.2 has the correct dependency. It would not be a very bad thing if 0.9.6.2 were x86, but right now the version marked stable is 0.9.5.

I suggest therefore that the dependency is added to all kmyfirewall ebuilds.

Cheers,
-Federico</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dragonheart@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-18 16:18:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Good point. 0.9.6.2 marked stable and other version include a iptables depend too. Thanks again.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>zenith@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-19 02:50:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Confirmed spotting in portage &amp; closing bug. Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>29486</attachid>
            <date>2004-04-17 06:10 0000</date>
            <desc>Patch for portage ebuild for kmyfirewall.0.9.6.2</desc>
            <filename>kmyfirewall-0.9.6.2.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">MTJhMTMsMTQKPiBSREVQRU5EPSIke1JERVBFTkR9IG5ldC1maXJld2FsbC9pcHRhYmxlcyIKPiAK
</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>