<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>43363</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-03-01 03:33 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>please remove vile-9.2r (or fix perl dep)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-03-01 10:36:26 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>mcummings@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>vim@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mcummings@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-03-01 03:33:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This ebuild is actually superceded for KEYWORDS by two later versions. During the transition from perl 5.6.1 to 5.8.X this ebuild was marked as incompatible with 5.8 (later fixed in following versions of vile). Can someone on the vim group either remove the ebuild or update it&apos;s perl requirements? Thanks!

-Mike</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rphillips@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-03-01 10:36:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Removed outdated ebuild versions 9.2{p,r,z} since they didn&apos;t support the new perl.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>