37704 2004-01-09 08:42 0000 Aquapfont was removed from portage tree based on incorrect information 2004-07-24 09:40:46 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 36391 1 skumagai@ic.sunysb.edu x11@gentoo.org pascalbrax@freesurf.ch usata@gentoo.org skumagai@ic.sunysb.edu 2004-01-09 08:42:41 0000 Media-fonts/aquapfont was removed from portage tree based on a bug report(36391). However, media-fonts/aquapfont is not a duplicate of media-fonts/aquafont. As the "p" in the package name indicates, aquapfont is a "propotional" font, while aquafont is not. And the version number of these fonts differs because the original author mentains them seperately (currently aquafont is 2.7 and aquapfont is 2.5). Re-add aquapfont in the portage tree, please. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Expected Results: media-fonts/aquapfont reappears in the portage tree. dberkholz@gentoo.org 2004-01-09 17:55:23 0000 Sorry about that. Anyway, will get the fonts herd made this weekend once I'm back on broadband and fix my mistake unless someone else cares to. dberkholz@gentoo.org 2004-01-12 21:58:24 0000 Fixed in CVS. dberkholz@gentoo.org 2004-07-23 20:11:37 0000 *** Bug 58142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** pascalbrax@freesurf.ch 2004-07-24 09:21:37 0000 i suggest to change the short description so that aquafont and aquapfont does not appear as dupes usata@gentoo.org 2004-07-24 09:40:46 0000 Yup, changed that today. Thanks for the comment.