<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>37454</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-01-06 21:18 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-office/kbudget compiles and runs on amd64</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-03-30 04:51:49 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>AMD64</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>richard@garandnet.net</reporter>
          <assigned_to>amd64@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>maze@strahlungsfrei.de</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>richard@garandnet.net</who>
            <bug_when>2004-01-06 21:18:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I successfully compiled and ran app-office/kbudget on amd64, but I haven&apos;t tested everything; it would probably be a good idea to mark it ~amd64.

Also, I accidentally left the 0.6 ebuild marked ~x86 in Bug 36846; it&apos;s at least as stable as 0.5 and should be marked x86 instead.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com</who>
            <bug_when>2004-02-22 17:36:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>you marked the hardware wrong</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aliz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-02-25 06:20:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>In CVS, thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aliz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-03-30 04:51:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 45745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>