<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>36684</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2003-12-28 15:28 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>gtkam gnome USE broken (needs docs)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-04-19 12:58:12 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>1.4</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P4</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>gnome@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-28 15:28:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I would think that with the gnome USE flag set, that gtkam would compile --with-gnome to enable GNOME support.  It appears, via a grep for GNOME, that the problem may be with line 70 of configure.in, which looks for the libgnomeui-2.0 package.  Maybe we could do something here to fix this?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-29 04:40:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>what i gather from checking the ebuild it does just that. The deps also mention libgnomeui-2.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-29 06:00:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Unfortunately, it does not.  It specifically says at the end of the configure stage that GNOME Support: no, and I never see the proper Gnome information whatsoever.  I&apos;m no expert on configure scripts, but it looks like it is using pkg-config --exists libgnomeui-2.0 to find if it exists.  It is returning a zero.

config.status: creating po/Makefile
 
 
Configuration
 
        Source code location: .
        Compiler:             gcc
 
        GIMP plugin:          no
        EXIF support:         yes
        Bonobo support:       yes
        GNOME support:        no

This is from the bottom of the configure stage.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-30 08:04:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hm ok, i checked the package. It seems you also need gphoto2 documentation for this to work and the gnome support consists mainly of yelp based help.

We don&apos;t have the ebuild for the docs, so that should be added first.

But i&apos;m not much into gphoto related stuff, so i might be wrong.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-30 10:11:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Maybe we should simply comment out the gnome parts of RDEPEND until the documentation can be added?

I don&apos;t really know what the best answer would be for this one.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-30 12:08:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>probably, the flag &amp; dep have no use now if i am correct.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2003-12-30 12:13:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Correct, they do not do anything and are unnecessary without the gtkam-manual.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>liquidx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-01-04 07:45:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>seems like gnome support equals a help entry in the menu that points to the gphoto2-manual. the configure script doesn&apos;t enable it because it can&apos;t find gphoto2-manual, which is true, because we don&apos;t have it in portage, and the doc package on gphoto&apos;s website doesn&apos;t have the required .pc file.

i&apos;ll check with the gphoto maintainers why the docs .pc file are only available in CVS.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-14 18:43:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Any word?

I think commenting the gnome parts would probably be best for now, since it has no effect either way other than to pull in deps which aren&apos;t even used.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foser@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-19 04:09:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sure, go ahead. add a link to this bug in the ebuild</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2004-04-19 12:58:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I have commented out the gnoem sections and left note of the bug #</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>