33123 2003-11-10 00:39 0000 im-ja version 0.8 now includes XIM (distfile needs new digest) 2003-12-13 07:30:57 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 plate@gentoo.org cjk@gentoo.org plate@gentoo.org 2003-11-10 00:39:45 0000 Yesterday the developer of im-ja has announced xim support for non-GTK-applications. This being great in itself, he unfortunately hasn't changed the version number, meaning the old tarball named im-ja-0.8.tar.gz is not the same as the one residing at the ebuild's SRC_URI now. usata@gentoo.org 2003-11-10 03:20:19 0000 Can you show exactly the SRC_URI where we can get the sourcetarball? I've just fetched im-ja from http://im-ja.sourceforge.net/im-ja-0.8.tar.gzbut it has the same MD5 as in /usr/portage/app-i18n/im-ja/files/digest-im-ja-0.8. plate@gentoo.org 2003-11-10 03:37:41 0000 Of course. The new tarball is here: http://siliconium.net/~boti/im-ja/im-ja-0.8.tar.gz Check http://www.tlug.jp/ML/0311/msg00056.html for the announcement and a few details on what B0Ti did. ID & password for the mailing list archive are: http://www.tlug.jp/images/tlug-pword.png. usata@gentoo.org 2003-11-10 06:27:53 0000 yakina, what do you think about making an ebuild with a different name, say, im-ja-0.9_alpha20031109.ebuild ? plate@gentoo.org 2003-11-11 01:43:54 0000 Coincidentally, this is what the author implicitly seems to recommend. :) Quoting http://www.tlug.jp/ML/0311/msg00061.html: "The official v0.8 release (from September) available from SF doesn't have any xim support, I was just too lazy to bump the version number for this preview release to 0.9-alpha. I'd want to wait pushing this into portage until it's released as 0.9." Sorry to have started this unnecessary precipitation... usata@gentoo.org 2003-12-13 07:30:57 0000 I've just included it as im-ja-0.9_alpha20031109.ebuild. It is masked until the next 0.9 release, so if you are interested in trying it, unmask it using /etc/portage/package.unmask and then emerge. Thanks for reporting.