29950 2003-09-29 13:55 0000 gcc-config doesn't allow multiple library paths in LDPATH= 2004-06-20 08:04:20 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux GCC Porting unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 18933 29952 1 brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com toolchain@gentoo.org dev-portage@gentoo.org ed@catmur.co.uk iggy@gentoo.org tester@gentoo.org brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com 2003-09-29 13:55:51 0000 Basically because of a if [ -d "${LDPATH}" ] statement, it doesn't allow an LDPATH like this: LDPATH="dir1:dir2:dir3" yet, LDPATH parameters in /etc/env.d _do_ allow that. This is a patch to comment out that restriction. This is required for a GCC patch I'm about to submit for multilib support for GCC on amd64 brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com 2003-09-29 13:56:49 0000 Created an attachment (id=18500) patch to allow multiple paths LDPATH when using gcc-config brad@mainstreetsoftworks.com 2003-10-18 12:45:08 0000 gcc-config-1.3.3-r2 has these changes needed for gcc-3.3.1-r5 for amd64 lv@gentoo.org 2004-05-05 13:54:19 0000 *** Bug 50132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** lv@gentoo.org 2004-05-05 13:55:33 0000 ok, it seems this bug now applies to all archs and not just amd64. since i am on an amd64 box, i never even noticed a problem.. since we seem to already have a fix. azarah@gentoo.org 2004-05-06 11:56:42 0000 Stupid question - does it have the entries in the correct order in ld.so.conf? vapier@gentoo.org 2004-05-06 17:45:14 0000 fixed in cvs lv@gentoo.org 2004-05-06 23:32:48 0000 martin - from my ld.so.conf: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.3 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.3 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.0 (i have 3.3.3 and 3.4.0 installed at the moment) same order regardless of which compiler is active. yeah... i'd say that's a bug. azarah@gentoo.org 2004-05-07 13:47:16 0000 Yeah, some nut in portage dev decided that the order in env.d doesn't bother him, and went and sorted it. Might be mistaken though, but I want to remember it did not do it in the past (and why my gcc2/gcc3 installation did the right thing at the time, before I wiped it). Can anybody in portage dev confirm that ld.so.conf entries was not always sorted? This is also sorda a sticky issue with mozilla/firefox/etc. azarah@gentoo.org 2004-05-08 07:29:00 0000 Oh, and could we add it in the order it appears in /etc/env.d/ ? carpaski@gentoo.org 2004-05-16 04:05:05 0000 Yeah... Looks like the sort has been in since at least October... It's in every version since 2.0.49-r15, at least. It's not present in any portage-2.0.51. azarah@gentoo.org 2004-06-20 08:04:20 0000 Ok, this should be fine now ... 18500 2003-09-29 13:56 0000 patch to allow multiple paths LDPATH when using gcc-config gcc-config.amd64.patch text/plain LS0tIC91c3IvYmluL2djYy1jb25maWcub2xkCTIwMDMtMDktMjkgMTY6Mzg6MTQuMzkyMzMzOTUy IC0wNDAwCisrKyAvdXNyL2Jpbi9nY2MtY29uZmlnCTIwMDMtMDktMjkgMTY6Mzk6NDcuMzA4MjA4 NTkyIC0wNDAwCkBAIC0xNzcsMTUgKzE3NywxNyBAQAogCiAJCQlpZiBbIC16ICIke01ZX0xEUEFU SH0iIF0KIAkJCXRoZW4KLQkJCQlpZiBbIC1kICIke0xEUEFUSH0iIF0KLQkJCQl0aGVuCisJCQkJ IyBkb24ndCBjaGVjayB0byBzZWUgaWYgdGhlIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBleGlzdHMKKwkJCQkjIGl0IGNv dWxkIGJlIG11bHRpcGxlIHBhdGhzIHNlcGVyYXRlZCBieSAnOicKKyMJCQkJaWYgWyAtZCAiJHtM RFBBVEh9IiBdCisjCQkJCXRoZW4KIAkJCQkJTVlfTERQQVRIPSIke0xEUEFUSH0iCi0JCQkJZmkK KyMJCQkJZmkKIAkJCWVsc2UKLQkJCQlpZiBbIC1kICIke0xEUEFUSH0iIF0KLQkJCQl0aGVuCisj CQkJCWlmIFsgLWQgIiR7TERQQVRIfSIgXQorIwkJCQl0aGVuCiAJCQkJCU1ZX0xEUEFUSD0iJHtN WV9MRFBBVEh9OiR7TERQQVRIfSIKLQkJCQlmaQorIwkJCQlmaQogCQkJZmkKIAkJZmkKIAlkb25l Cg==