27214 2003-08-24 02:33 0000 glabels-1.91.1 (New Ebuild) 2003-09-28 04:06:18 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 enhancement --- 1 wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net gnome@gentoo.org martin.klaffenboeck@gmx.at ralphdewitt@charter.net wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-08-24 02:33:49 0000 Author: Jim Evins <evins@snaught.com> Description: gLabels is a lightweight program for creating labels and business cards for the GNOME desktop environment. Homepage: http://snaught.com/glabels/ This application truely showcases excellence in design and implementation. A GNOME2 app that is HIG compliant, production ready, complete with around a hundred label templates built in, including CD and business card templates for Avery, Neato, Memorex, and CD Stomper, and with an XML templating system, users can create their own templates for layouts not already included. (and I thought I'd have to use GIMP to print avery labels under GNU/Linux) wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-08-24 02:35:29 0000 Created an attachment (id=16530) Ebuild for glabels-1.91.1 wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-08-24 02:38:28 0000 Created an attachment (id=16532) Patch to fix glabels.desktop obz@gentoo.org 2003-09-17 03:56:59 0000 *** Bug 28773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** obz@gentoo.org 2003-09-17 03:57:50 0000 *note* 1.92.0 is out martin.klaffenboeck@gmx.at 2003-09-23 01:20:01 0000 Why is this a duplicate of 27214 ? The versions are different, and there is not here and not there an ebuild to find for 1.92.0 version of glabels? Can I find it somewhere? Martin wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-09-23 11:16:49 0000 I agree, 28773 is not a duplicate of 27214. Martin, I submitted an ebuild for glabels-1.92.0 last night, see bug 29381. Hopefully it will get committed instead of getting stale in bugzilla like my submission of glabels-1.91.1 (hint, hint) foser@gentoo.org 2003-09-24 05:16:33 0000 it's a dup because it's the same package, we only need one bug to see it needs updating. Anyway, we're still talking about a devel version here, so to us this is low priority. foser@gentoo.org 2003-09-24 05:16:46 0000 *** Bug 29381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-09-24 14:25:47 0000 foser, you're missing the whole point...yes it needs updating and so I've just GIVEN you the ebuilds. Development version ? Sure, if you want to get technical about it, but the "stable" versions are ONLY for GTK+-1 not GTK+-2. The "development" releases are the only ones being maintained. This one (27214) I submitted a month ago, now it is stale. Bug 28773 would be resolved by committing 1.91.1 and 1.92.0 and bumping 1.91.1 to stable. As would bug 29076. And while we're at it, glabels would fit better into the app-office category instead of app-misc. foser@gentoo.org 2003-09-25 01:33:18 0000 i don't think i'm missing a point, i think you are missing my point, but whatever. And _nothing_ goes in the tree stable right away, being in bugzilla is no testing period. See it as ebuild refinement period. If it goes in, only the latest release goes in and probably package.mask-ed as well. And use the gnome2 eclass. wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-09-25 11:04:45 0000 Ok, firstly, I understand nothing goes in the tree stable right away, but you have 2 bugs that are known to be resolved by using a newer version, 2 of which you now have ebuilds for, so wouldn't it be better to have users be able to emerge glabels successfully instead of filing more bug reports and asking questions like "why won't glabels compile" ? Secondly, package.mask'ed as well ? I've never seen anything package.mask'ed by default except for things like all of gnome 2.4 or gcc or glibc, you know, things that will break your system if they don't work properly. But regardless of how I feel about your handling of this, I'll add a new ebuild which uses the gnome2 eclass to bug 29381 and re-open it since it certainly is not a duplicate of this one. If you like, close this one (27214) since it doesn't apply anymore. Frankly, "giving back to the community" here is more like pulling teeth...or maybe getting teeth pulled. foser@gentoo.org 2003-09-25 12:34:40 0000 I know of no recent bugreports on 'why won't glabels compile'. We package.mask-ed a few more packages which are in the transition phase of becoming a gtk2 app. Most of them have hit a stable gtk/gnome2 release by now, but an example still in p.mask is gimp-1.3 . Gnome 2.4 was similar, although it wasn't 2.4 at the time, but 2.4 release candidates (so pre-2.4). It's about not having John Doe user out there using an unstable package. The current ebuild was added long ago and shouldn't have been added like this in my opinion. I'm not sure why you feel mistreated by this, this bug has higher priority than a lot of other (more stable) packages still (some even longer) in queue. I just explained our view on packages like this. We are just too swamped with work to get around to some things. And do you think i like the 'giving back to the community' thing here, we get treated like enemies at times. I'm a dev and get nothing more out of it than you do and put a whole lot more work in to it probably and still we get treated like dirt when we do not fulfill ones wishes right away. Why can't reporters sometimes take our word for something ? But so much for that, it gets a bit into a personal rant and that should be done by mail if you feel like you need to reply to that. let's keep it on topic here. Please do not reopen the bug, a duplicate does not mean 'ignore the duplicate' to us. When this bug gets handled, we go trough the bug and the ones marked duplicate and pick the best ebuild and suggestions to work from. Feel free to attach an updated version. wolfwood@users.sourceforge.net 2003-09-25 21:40:30 0000 Check bug 29076 I fully understand the goal of not having users use an unstable package, but in this case there is no stable package for users to use under gnome2. I'm positive you do a lot more work than I do, but remember, I am doing the limit of what users are allowed to do. I'm sorry if you feel I have treated you like dirt, that has not been my intention at all. As for my wishes being fulfilled right away, a month has passed since I submitted an ebuild for the then, latest and greatest release of a package, which grew stale, and I realize the frustration that caused has been affecting my tone, the way I come across, so I apologize. New ebuild for glabels-1.92.0 utilizing the gnome2 eclass is in bug 29381. foser@gentoo.org 2003-09-26 04:27:14 0000 *** Bug 29076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** obz@gentoo.org 2003-09-28 04:06:18 0000 foser was right, we only need a single bug to track that an update to a package is required. no matter either way now, 1.92.0 is in portage. 16530 2003-08-24 02:35 0000 Ebuild for glabels-1.91.1 glabels-1.91.1.ebuild text/plain IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDAzIEdlbnRvbyBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMsIEluYy4KIyBEaXN0cmli dXRlZCB1bmRlciB0aGUgdGVybXMgb2YgdGhlIEdOVSBHZW5lcmFsIFB1YmxpYyBMaWNlbnNlIHYy CiMgJEhlYWRlcjogL2hvbWUvY3Zzcm9vdC9nZW50b28teDg2L2FwcC1taXNjL2dsYWJlbHMvZ2xh YmVscy0xLjkwLjAuZWJ1aWxkLHYgMS40IDIwMDMvMDcvMjggMDk6NTU6NTcgZm9zZXIgRXhwICQK CklVU0U9IiIKClNSQ19VUkk9Imh0dHA6Ly9zbmF1Z2h0LmNvbS8ke1BOfS9zb3VyY2UvJHtQfS50 YXIuZ3oiCgpERVNDUklQVElPTj0iUHJvZ3JhbSBmb3IgY3JlYXRpbmcgbGFiZWxzIGFuZCBidXNp bmVzcyBjYXJkcyIKSE9NRVBBR0U9Imh0dHA6Ly9zbmF1Z2h0LmNvbS9nbGFiZWxzLyIKTElDRU5T RT0iR1BMLTIiCgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4NiIKClJERVBFTkQ9Ij49eDExLWxpYnMv Z3RrKy0yLjAuNQoJPj1kZXYtbGlicy9saWJ4bWwyLTIuNC4yMwoJPj1nbm9tZS1iYXNlL2xpYmdu b21lcHJpbnQtMS4xMTUKCT49Z25vbWUtYmFzZS9saWJnbm9tZXByaW50dWktMS4xMTUKCT49Z25v bWUtYmFzZS9saWJnbm9tZWNhbnZhcy0yLjAuMQoJPj1nbm9tZS1iYXNlL2xpYmdub21ldWktMi4w LjEKCT49Z25vbWUtYmFzZS9saWJib25vYm8tMiIKCkRFUEVORD0iJHtSREVQRU5EfQoJPj1kZXYt dXRpbC9wa2djb25maWctMC44Cgk+PWRldi11dGlsL2ludGx0b29sLTAuMjEiCgpTPSR7V09SS0RJ Un0vJHtQfQoKc3JjX3VucGFjaygpIHsKCXVucGFjayAke0F9CgllcGF0Y2ggJHtGSUxFU0RJUn0v JHtQfS1kZXNrdG9wZml4LnBhdGNoCn0KCnNyY19jb21waWxlKCkgewoJZWNvbmYgLS1lbmFibGUt cGxhdGZvcm0tZ25vbWUtMiB8fCBkaWUgIi4vY29uZmlndXJlIGZhaWxlZCIKCgllbWFrZSB8fCBk aWUKfQoKc3JjX2luc3RhbGwoKSB7CgllaW5zdGFsbCB8fCBkaWUKCgkjIFB1dCB0aGUgLmRlc2t0 b3AgZmlsZSBpbiBhIG1vcmUgcmVhc29uYWJsZSBwbGFjZQoJbXYgXAoJCSR7RH0vdXNyL3NoYXJl L2dub21lL2FwcHMvQXBwbGljYXRpb25zIFwKCQkke0R9L3Vzci9zaGFyZS9hcHBsaWNhdGlvbnMK Cglkb2RvYyBBVVRIT1JTIENPUFlJTkcgUkVBRE1FIFRPRE8KfQo= 16532 2003-08-24 02:38 0000 Patch to fix glabels.desktop glabels-1.91.1-desktopfix.patch text/plain LS0tIGdsYWJlbHMtMS45MS4xL2dsYWJlbHMuZGVza3RvcAkyMDAyLTA4LTIwIDE5OjI3OjQwLjAw MDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMAorKysgZ2xhYmVscy0xLjkxLjEtbmV3L2dsYWJlbHMuZGVza3RvcAkyMDAz LTA4LTIzIDIxOjM0OjI0LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDcwMApAQCAtMSw5ICsxLDEwIEBACiBbRGVza3Rv cCBFbnRyeV0KIE5hbWU9Z0xhYmVscwogTmFtZVtqYV09Z0xhYmVscwotQ29tbWVudD1DcmVhdGUg TGFiZWxzICYgQnVzaW5lc3MgQ2FyZHMKK0NvbW1lbnQ9Q3JlYXRlIGxhYmVscyBhbmQgYnVzaW5l c3MgY2FyZHMKIENvbW1lbnRbamFdPaXppdml66TIpdOluKXNpbmlq6G8pcmkzrruwK6l16XtpbCl 6aXgCiBFeGVjPWdsYWJlbHMKIEljb249Z2xhYmVscy9nbGFiZWxzLWljb24ucG5nCiBUZXJtaW5h bD0wCiBUeXBlPUFwcGxpY2F0aW9uCitDYXRlZ29yaWVzPUdOT01FO0FwcGxpY2F0aW9uO09mZmlj ZTsK