25428 2003-07-28 07:05 0000 Biopython version bump 2004-02-29 08:22:16 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED http://www.biopython.org P2 enhancement --- 1 daniel@jaeggi.co.uk george@gentoo.org leroutier@gmail.com daniel@jaeggi.co.uk 2003-07-28 07:05:49 0000 Hi Biopython has had a version bump (now 1.20). It's a bugfix release and the only thing that needs to be done with the ebuild is change its name. Is it also possible to unmask this package (or at least the 1.10 version). It's been around for a while now and given it's a python package which, once installed, tend to be operationally fairly tame, it seems silly to keep it masked. I for one have installed this package on numerous Linux installations, mostly gentoo, some RH and SuSE and it's really fine. I know, QA and all, and I'm sure this package doesn't see much traffic!! Thanks Daniel daniel@jaeggi.co.uk 2003-07-29 01:46:12 0000 OK, biopython has just had 1.21 released because some modules were inadvertently left out of 1.20! Basically, 1.20 shouldn't be used. Dan george@gentoo.org 2003-08-08 16:37:47 0000 Hi Daniel. Thanks for notification. I have updated the ebuild, please test! Also, during install phase stup.py complains something about Martel, however installs it anyway. Could you please check what's up with that? I marked 1.10 stable. George leroutier@gmail.com 2003-10-01 09:19:37 0000 121 is in portage so, time to close this bug report ? pbienst@gentoo.org 2004-02-29 08:22:16 0000 Biopython 1.23 is now marked as stable, and 1.24 is in the unstable tree. Closing this bug.