244952 2008-10-30 09:49 0000 dev-ruby/rubygems-1.2.0: request for stabilization 2008-12-04 08:56:42 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P2 critical --- 1 migolsk8@gmail.com ruby@gentoo.org fmccor@gentoo.org migolsk8@gmail.com 2008-10-30 09:49:58 0000 I think that RubyGems 1.2.0 should be stabilized as soon as possible. Reason for that is that version 1.1.1 which have been stable one crashes when installing a gem while updating list of gems. It uses MASSIVE (c.a. 1 gig) amounts of RAM. I've installed unstable 1.2.0 version and no such problems occured. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: graaff@gentoo.org 2008-10-31 07:43:05 0000 Agreed. Arches, please stabilize rubygems 1.2.0. Although we have not seen the large use of ram ourselves, rubygems 1.2.0 contains a number of other improvements and bug fixes that we would like to get out there. fmccor@gentoo.org 2008-10-31 13:37:53 0000 Sparc stable. I've been using it since late June, and it seems fine. migolsk8@gmail.com 2008-10-31 15:12:52 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Agreed. Arches, please stabilize rubygems 1.2.0. Although we have not seen the > large use of ram ourselves, rubygems 1.2.0 contains a number of other > improvements and bug fixes that we would like to get out there. > This problem occurs only in certain configurations, nobody really knows what is going on, although 1.2.0 contains rebuilt module that in 1.1.1 fails. jer@gentoo.org 2008-10-31 16:05:27 0000 Stable for HPPA. nixnut@gentoo.org 2008-11-01 18:05:45 0000 ppc stable maekke@gentoo.org 2008-11-02 14:52:30 0000 amd64/x86 stable armin76@gentoo.org 2008-11-03 11:23:08 0000 alpha/ia64 stable ranger@gentoo.org 2008-12-02 22:32:31 0000 ppc64 done graaff@gentoo.org 2008-12-04 08:56:42 0000 All arches stable, closing bug.