<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>236057</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-08-28 19:33 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilize many rox-base and rox-extra packages</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-09-01 22:02:35 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>2007.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>lack@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>rox@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lack@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-28 19:33:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sorry this is all in one big clump, but that&apos;s apparently how I work :)  They&apos;ve all been in the tree for more than 30 days, no outstanding bugs.

First, would all CC&apos;d arches please stabilize the following apps, in this order:

------------------------
rox-base/zeroinstall-injector-0.33
  To test, run &apos;0launch --gui&apos; on the commandline - You should get the 0install gui - If it opens, it&apos;s safe to assume that the rest works.

rox-base/rox-lib-2.0.5
  Can be tested by running &apos;rox-mime-editor&apos; (rox-base/mime-editor) which uses this library.

rox-base/mime-editor-0.5-r2
  Can be tested by running &apos;rox-mime-editor&apos;

rox-base/thumbs-0.1.4
  Can be tested by running &apos;rox-thumbs&apos;

rox-extra/videothumbnail-0.1.13-r1
  Test by running &apos;rox-videothumbnail&apos; -&gt; You should get a dialog asking you to install the handlers, which is sufficient.

rox-base/rox-2.8
  Test by running &apos;rox&apos;
------------------------

Thank you to the alpha team - You can stop here.  Other arches please continue below:

------------------------
rox-base/xdg-menu-1.4
  Test by running &apos;rox-xdg-menu&apos; and then click &quot;Continue in window mode&quot;.

rox-base/rox-session-0.30-r4
  If you run GDM, this should make a &quot;ROX&quot; session show up in your session menu.  Or just run &apos;rox-session&apos; at a console and it should ask you if you want to install rox-session as your session handler.
------------------------

This next section can be skipped by ppc - It&apos;s for x86 and sparc only.  But there&apos;s more for ppc after this:

------------------------
rox-base/rox-clib-2.1.10
  Test by running &apos;rox-pager&apos; (rox-base/pager)

rox-base/pager-1.1-r2
  Test by running &apos;rox-pager&apos;

rox-base/systemtrayn-0.3.2
  Test by running &apos;rox-systemtrayn&apos; - You&apos;ll probably just get an error message that you already have a system tray running, but that depends on your existing X environment.

rox-base/traylib-0.3.2.1
  Test by running &apos;rox-tasktray&apos; which is next in this list.

rox-base/tasktray-0.7
  Test by running &apos;rox-tasktray&apos;
------------------------

Thank you to the sparc team - Your work here is done.  This next section is for x86 and ppc:
------------------------
rox-extra/archive-2.2
  Test by running &apos;rox-archive /usr/portage/distfiles/archive-2.2.tar.bz2&apos; - It should ask you where to extract the tarball.

rox-extra/edit-2.0-r1
  Test by running &apos;rox-edit&apos;

rox-extra/fetch-0.3.3
  Test by runing &apos;rox-fetch&apos;, you should get the options pane.
------------------------

Thanks ppc team - That&apos;s all.  The rest here is all for x86:

------------------------
rox-base/devtray-0.4.1
  Test by running &apos;rox-devtray&apos;

rox-base/rox-launch-0.3.2
  Test with &apos;rox-launch&apos;

rox-base/tasklist-0.5
  Test with &apos;rox-tasklist&apos;

rox-extra/downloadmanager-0.1.4
  Test by setting up rox-fetch and trying to download a bunch of large files at once.  downloadmanager should automatically pop up (thanks to dbus) and ensure only the requested number run at once.

rox-extra/weather-0.3.1
  Test with &apos;rox-weather&apos;
------------------------

Thanks!  You&apos;ve been great.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cyrilmaley@hotmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-29 00:20:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I am sorry if this is the wrong place to request less restrictive keywording, but I have the following Rox packages working fine on ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 :

rox-base/mime-editor-0.5-r2
rox-base/oroborox-0.9.8-r1
rox-base/pager-1.1-r2
rox-base/rox-2.8
rox-base/rox-clib-2.1.10
rox-base/rox-lib-2.0.5
rox-base/rox-session-0.30-r4
rox-base/tasklist-0.5
rox-base/thumbs-0.1.4
rox-base/volume-009-r1
rox-base/xdg-menu-1.4
rox-base/zeroinstall-injector-0.33
rox-extra/clock-2.1.7
rox-extra/edit-2.0-r1
rox-extra/fetch-0.3.3
rox-extra/mp3ogg2wav-1.0
rox-extra/roxcd-0.5.4-r2
rox-extra/roxdao-0.4-r1
rox-extra/roxiso-061007-r1
rox-extra/wallpaper-2.1
rox-extra/weather-0.3.1
x11-terms/roxterm-1.11.1
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lack@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-29 11:29:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; I am sorry if this is the wrong place to request less restrictive keywording,
&gt; but I have the following Rox packages working fine on ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 :

This is exactly the place - In fact, I just moved most of those packages from ~amd64 to amd64 myself, and I&apos;m expecting that the x86 and ppc arch teams should be moving everything in my lists above from ~x86 to ~ppc, except of course the things that are not yet ~ppc.

So, are you saying that you actually have that whole list working such that ~ppc should be added to all those packages?  If so, then would the ppc team CC&apos;d here already please consider adding their keywords to the list of packages in Comment #1?

However, I will *not* stabilize oroborox, since it&apos;s not really feature-complete as a WM right now.

Also, I do not maintain &lt;x11-terms/roxterm&gt; so I suggest you open a separate bug about that one package.

Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ranger@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-30 15:40:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok, so I keyworded the original list to be ppc.  Then I found the ones listed in the next comment for ppc and marked those without a keyword as ~.  </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-30 20:07:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>please note the following minor issues that I spotted:
rox-base/pager-1.1-r2: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase
rox-base/systemtrayn-0.3.2: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase
rox-base/tasklist-0.5: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase
rox-base/rox-clib-2.1.10: dodoc: /usr/lib/ROX-CLib does not exist

x86 stable anyway.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-01 09:43:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha/sparc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-01 22:02:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>actually remove x86, everybody is done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>