<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>235922</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-08-27 15:28 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilization of new gnustep-* versions</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-09-24 16:31:37 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>212692</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>voyageur@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>gnustep@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>ppc64@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>voyageur@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-27 15:28:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yes, it&apos;s that time of the year again, with a new round of gnustep-base, gnustep-apps and gnustep-libs stable requests!

ppc64, can you stable gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.0.6

amd64, ppc, sparc, x86, here are new gnustep-base packages stable candidates:
gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.0.6
gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.16.3
gnustep-base/gnustep-gui-0.14.0-r1
gnustep-base/gnustep-back-art-0.14.0
gnustep-base/gnustep-back-cairo-0.14.0
gnustep-base/gnustep-back-xlib-0.14.0
virtual/gnustep-back-0.14.0

amd64 and x86, can you also try gnustep-base/gnustep-back-cairo-0.14.0?

And for apps/libs, for amd64, ppc, x86:
gnustep-libs/renaissance-0.9.0
gnustep-apps/gorm-1.2.4
gnustep-apps/price-0.8.2
gnustep-apps/simpleagenda-0.36
gnustep-apps/zipper-1.3

Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-30 20:41:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>gnustep-base/gnustep-gui-0.14.0-r1 needs media-libs/portaudio-19_pre20071207 stable, see bug #236230.

just FYI, I already stabilised the following two packages on amd64/x86:
gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.0.6
gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.16.3</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-13 11:20:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>breakage on ppc:

 * Generating nfonts support files
/usr/GNUstep/System/Tools/mknfonts: error while loading shared libraries: libgnustep-base.so.1.14: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
 *
 * ERROR: gnustep-base/gnustep-back-art-0.14.0 failed.

gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.16.3 is installed and obviously doesn&apos;t supply libgnustep-base.so.1.14
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>voyageur@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-15 09:27:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Seeing the comments in bug #236230, stable portaudio-19 is not a good idea for now, so let&apos;s stable =gnustep-base/gnustep-gui-0.14.0 instead of -r1 (same apart from missing portaudio). Sorry for not seeing the trouble with portaudio-19

@nixnut: you need to re-emerge mknfonts, gnustep-base changes .so version at every major bump (pkg_postinst warning). I know it&apos;s a less than ideal situation for now, but portage with preserved-libs will help when it&apos;s stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-17 21:15:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64/x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-09-21 15:47:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>bluebird@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-10-03 17:35:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>voyageur@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-06-09 16:29:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64, instead, you can stable =gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.2.0

I&apos;ll probably clean &lt;gnustep-make-2.0.6 after that</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tgall@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-09-22 02:25:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>FYI for ppc64, I&apos;m slowly staring to keyword across the gnustep-* package universe....</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>voyageur@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-09-24 07:35:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Nice, are you aiming the same packages as ppc?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>voyageur@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-09-24 16:31:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marking this one fixed, =gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.2.0 stable request is in bug #272673</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>