235703 2008-08-25 18:56 0000 app-text/texlive-core should block app-text/dvibook 2008-08-30 10:31:28 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 ulm@gentoo.org aballier@gentoo.org tex@gentoo.org ulm@gentoo.org 2008-08-25 18:56:07 0000 * package app-text/texlive-core-2007-r13 NOT merged * * Detected file collision(s): * * /usr/bin/dviselect * /usr/bin/dviconcat * /usr/bin/dvitodvi * /usr/bin/dvibook * /usr/share/man/man1/dvitodvi.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dvibook.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dviselect.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dviconcat.1.gz * * Detected file collision(s): * * /usr/bin/dviselect * /usr/bin/dviconcat * /usr/bin/dvitodvi * /usr/bin/dvibook * /usr/share/man/man1/dvitodvi.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dvibook.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dviselect.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/dviconcat.1.gz aballier@gentoo.org 2008-08-28 15:45:17 0000 blocker added, thanks i'll try to remove the bundled one for tl2008 and use our ebuild instead aballier@gentoo.org 2008-08-30 09:15:04 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > i'll try to remove the bundled one for tl2008 and use our ebuild instead hmm; i can't fetch the directory from ctan. texlive version is a kpathsea enabled one and seems to be more up to date and maintained. I'm starting to think it'd be better to last rite dvibook and use tl version instead. Opinions ? It seems that was you who submitted the ebuild many years ago :) ulm@gentoo.org 2008-08-30 09:41:10 0000 (In reply to comment #2) > I'm starting to think it'd be better to last rite dvibook and use tl version > instead. > > Opinions ? It seems that was you who submitted the ebuild many years ago :) Yeah, bug 56468. ;-) What about tetex and ptex users? They can't use the texlive version and would lose the functionality. Wouldn't it make sense to wait with last-rites for dvibook until tetex/ptex go away, too? aballier@gentoo.org 2008-08-30 09:52:27 0000 (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I'm starting to think it'd be better to last rite dvibook and use tl version > > instead. > > > > Opinions ? It seems that was you who submitted the ebuild many years ago :) > > Yeah, bug 56468. ;-) > > What about tetex and ptex users? They can't use the texlive version and would > lose the functionality. Wouldn't it make sense to wait with last-rites for > dvibook until tetex/ptex go away, too? yes it's ok that way too unless some people complain about it ;) (so far i see it ignores ldflags, minor issue though) anyway I hope there aren't much tetex users left; they'll probably have more problems than the pain it would be to migrate to tl; see bug #227443, nothing has moved, I'll probably reassign it to m-n soon. aballier@gentoo.org 2008-08-30 10:31:28 0000 lets set this one as fixed and keep dvibook for tetex & friends.