<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>234713</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-08-14 08:55 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>GLEP 55: Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-02-13 07:27:10 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Unspecified</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>LATER</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>dberkholz@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>council@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>arfrever@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>coldwind@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>levertond@googlemail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>oahong@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>peper@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dberkholz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-08-14 08:55:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&lt;Betelgeuse@&gt; But I don&apos;t see the use of accepting it before we a) 
                    Portage has something that would make use of it b) some 
                    other pkg manager is made official
&lt;   Halcy0n@&gt; So, can we vote on postponing a GLEP of this nature until 
                    another glep requires such changes?

Summary: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may be, 
but that&apos;s unclear until it&apos;s been revised.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-11-13 20:27:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Still on hold for more information or a concrete need.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-11-13 21:00:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>As discussed by the Council on Nov 13th, 2008:

Since this is on hold for a concrete need and there needs to be more consensus and information here, we&apos;ve decided to resolve this to LATER and when such a time comes have it re-opened.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lu_zero@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-02-13 07:27:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Alternatives:
- (Use Manifest or alternate syncpoints) http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero/glep/migrationpath.rst
- Use binary offset and just have portage seek &amp; read to get the data
  - Extend it to fetch additional data given a second offset after the first 
chunk of data (Kingtaco on irc)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>