231675 2008-07-13 11:27 0000 dev-python/twisted{,-words,-web]-8.1.0: Req. for stable-marking 2009-02-20 18:12:12 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Development unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P2 enhancement --- 206043 234765 1 hanno@gentoo.org python@gentoo.org coldwind@gentoo.org djc@gentoo.org mike@nerone.org qa@gentoo.org hanno@gentoo.org 2008-07-13 11:27:47 0000 I'd like to request stable marking of twisted-8.1.0 (and -web, -words, probably others). I know it fails in src_test, but that's no regression, old versions also do. python-team, please comment on it and cc archs if you're ok with that. hanno@gentoo.org 2008-08-04 21:56:55 0000 archs please go ahead fmccor@gentoo.org 2008-08-05 12:38:51 0000 Sparc done for twisted{-words,-web}-8.1.0 --- I'll leave us on CC in case you add to the list of requested packages. jer@gentoo.org 2008-08-08 03:12:41 0000 Stable for HPPA. corsair@gentoo.org 2008-08-08 18:41:21 0000 ppc64 stable armin76@gentoo.org 2008-08-08 19:18:39 0000 alpha/ia64/x86 stable coldwind@gentoo.org 2008-08-09 18:16:29 0000 @Python: What about -mail, -names, -news, -lore and -runner? djc@gentoo.org 2008-08-11 07:44:47 0000 Yeah, this is a problem. twisted-mail's stable version 0.3.0 is now only available for use with twisted-2.4.0, and recent buildbot seems to require twisted-mail, so all buildbot users cannot upgrade at this point. Please fix this. mike@nerone.org 2008-08-11 16:07:00 0000 dev-python/twisted-8.1.0 generates the following error during the first merge: ============================ * Byte compiling python modules for python-2.5 .. ... [ ok ] * Regenerating plugin cache Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/plugin.py", line 200, in getPlugins allDropins = getCache(package) --- <exception caught here> --- File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/plugin.py", line 165, in getCache provider = pluginModule.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/python/modules.py", line 380, in load return self.pathEntry.pythonPath.moduleLoader(self.name) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/python/modules.py", line 618, in moduleLoader return self._moduleLoader(modname) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 426, in namedAny topLevelPackage = _importAndCheckStack(trialname) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/plugins/testplugin.py", line 12, in <module> from twisted.plugin import IPlugin, ITestPlugin, ITestPlugin2 exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name ITestPlugin ================================ After the error, the installation is actually successful, but I'm not sure it's trustworthy. Merging a second time resolves the problem (I assume because ITestPlugin is now available - I didn't actually look). mike@nerone.org 2008-08-11 16:11:24 0000 And yes, the stable tree is broken. If you have any dependency on twisted-names, which has a dep on "=dev-python/twisted-2.4*", then portage will try to pull in both dev-python/twisted-2.4.0 and dev-python/twisted-8.1.0, which are in the same slot, so produce a conflict. mike@nerone.org 2008-08-11 16:12:27 0000 Sorry, I meant to point out that the current stable twisted-names, dev-python/twisted-names-0.3.0, has that "=dev-python/twisted-2.4*" dependency. hanno@gentoo.org 2008-08-11 16:33:04 0000 For the test failures, this is known, though it also appears in the current stable ones, so it's not a regression. Beside -web and -words, the following have hard deps on 2.4, so should probably be stable marked in sync: -xish -runner -pair -news -names -mail -lore -flow -conch coldwind@gentoo.org 2008-08-11 17:01:22 0000 After some testing, it seems to me that these are ready to go stable: twisted-8.1.0 twisted-web-8.1.0 twisted-words-8.1.0 twisted-conch-8.1.0 twisted-lore-8.1.0 twisted-mail-8.1.0 twisted-names-8.1.0 twisted-news-8.1.0 twisted-runner-8.0.0 And these packages should be removed from the tree: twisted-xish twisted-pair twisted-flow as well as twibber and old versions of pymsn-t which depend on twisted-xish. griffon26@gentoo.org 2008-08-11 18:02:18 0000 old pymsn-t removed fmccor@gentoo.org 2008-08-11 18:39:22 0000 Sparc stable also for: twisted-runner-8.0.0 twisted-names-8.1.0 twisted-conch-8.1.0 twisted-mail-8.1.0 twisted-news-8.1.0 twisted-conch-8.1.0 (All tests pass, although runner/names/news don't seem to have any tests.) Keeping sparc on CC in case more requirements emerge. neurogeek@gentoo.org 2008-08-12 03:38:07 0000 Hello, dev-python/twisted-xish dev-python/twisted-pair dev-python/twisted-flow dev-python/twibber Are now masked for removal in 30 days. as Coldwind pointed out, they are of no use now. Please, go ahead with stabilization. Thanks, neurogeek@gentoo.org 2008-08-12 05:02:38 0000 Old versions of twisted-words (twisted-words-0.1.0-r1.ebuild and twisted-words-0.1.0-r2.ebuild) are removed from tree as they also depended on dev-python/twisted-xish Regards, coldwind@gentoo.org 2008-08-13 09:03:33 0000 amd64 stable. repoman warnings: dev-python/twisted-web/twisted-web-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-names/twisted-names-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-conch/twisted-conch-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-mail/twisted-mail-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-lore/twisted-lore-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-news/twisted-news-8.1.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined dev-python/twisted-runner/twisted-runner-8.0.0.ebuild: IUSE is not defined IUSE is set in twisted.eclass, but you should define it in the ebuild too, even if it's empty. armin76@gentoo.org 2008-08-13 11:17:10 0000 alpha/ia64/x86 stable carlo@gentoo.org 2008-08-14 21:04:13 0000 Marking something stable requires that all stable ebuilds work with the most recent stable common dependency you're stabilizing. This has been botched in this case, as comment 7 and bug 234765 highlight. cc'ing the QA team, since this should not happen in the stable tree. I wonder what is so hard about to understand that this is not acceptable, given that I see such issues a lot more often nowadays. coldwind@gentoo.org 2008-08-15 12:16:35 0000 Please, hppa and ppc64, stabilize ASAP since you still have broken stable tree. The rest of arches are ok. jer@gentoo.org 2008-08-15 13:55:31 0000 (In reply to comment #20) > Please, hppa and ppc64, stabilize ASAP since you still have broken stable tree. Stabilise what? coldwind@gentoo.org 2008-08-15 14:17:43 0000 (In reply to comment #21) > > Stabilise what? > See comment #12. Anything in that list if you have previous stable versions. jer@gentoo.org 2008-08-15 14:34:09 0000 Nothing to do. corsair@gentoo.org 2008-08-24 11:29:46 0000 ppc64 stable nixnut@gentoo.org 2008-12-20 18:39:42 0000 ppc stable armin76@gentoo.org 2009-02-20 18:12:12 0000 All seems done