<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>230822</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-07-05 06:17 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilize dev-ruby/rmagick-1.15.14</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-07-07 17:56:05 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>230339</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>graaff@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>ruby@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>fmccor@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-05 06:17:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This version has been in the tree for over a month with no open bug reports. It contains only a few bug fixes compared to currently stable 1.15.12, but one of those is crucial since that allows rmagick 1.15.14 to compile against the recently stabled imagemagick 6.4.0.x.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ranger@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-05 13:45:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ranger@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-05 13:47:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tanderson@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-05 15:10:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>maekke@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-06 12:56:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-07 01:23:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable for HPPA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fmccor@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-07 12:49:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sparc stable.  It builds its own examples as expected.  I wonder why we have both rmagic-1.xx and rmagic-2.xx in the same slot.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-07 13:07:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha/ia64 stable,closing</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-07-07 17:56:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; I wonder why we have
&gt; both rmagic-1.xx and rmagic-2.xx in the same slot.
&gt; 

They are not meant to be installed together, and 2.xx is a drop-in replacement for the 1.xx series modulo some ImageMagick changes. 2.xx is however a new codebase, so that&apos;s why both versions are still in the tree. All future development takes place on the 2.xx tree.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>