224833 2008-06-04 04:49 0000 gentoo-x86/eclass/rox.eclass:297: - python_mod_optimize should only be run in pkg_postinst() 2008-06-04 13:07:40 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified AMD64 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 nils@nils-andresen.de rox@gentoo.org nils@nils-andresen.de 2008-06-04 04:49:19 0000 Building rox-base/mime-editor-0.5-r2 (or -r1) fails with: RROR: rox-base/mime-editor-0.5-r2 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_install environment, line 2987: Called rox-0install_src_install environment, line 2790: Called rox_src_install environment, line 2950: Called python_mod_optimize 'src_install' environment, line 2723: Called die The specific snippet of code: [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} != postinst ]] && die "${FUNCNAME} should only be run in pkg_postinst()"; The die message: python_mod_optimize should only be run in pkg_postinst() The Problem would be the rox.eclass: It calls python_mod_optimize as the last line of rox_src_install(). Afer movin the Line into rox_pkg_postinst() all is fine ! Reproducible: Always jer@gentoo.org 2008-06-04 04:57:59 0000 A bit of automated QA it seems. lack@gentoo.org 2008-06-04 12:28:50 0000 I guess so! What's really odd is that I couldn't ever get a straight answer out of the python folks as to why python_mod_optimize should be run in pkg_postinst and not src_install. Oh well, moot point now, I'll just have to fix everything. lack@gentoo.org 2008-06-04 12:38:54 0000 Okay, all changed (as far as I know, anyway) Would have been nice had they mentioned somewhere they were going to start cracking down on this instead of breaking the tree, but there you go. lack@gentoo.org 2008-06-04 13:07:40 0000 Heh, turns out they did and I missed it, I rescind my previous slander :)