219292 2008-04-25 20:54 0000 High CPU usage in www-client/opera-9.50_beta1 2008-04-26 14:42:29 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 chescu@gmail.com jer@gentoo.org chescu@gmail.com 2008-04-25 20:54:42 0000 I updated from www-client/opera-9.2* (which, excluding Flash problem, worked fine for me) to www-client/opera-9.50_beta1 (which is keyword-masked but not package.mask masked). The problem I found with 9.50 Beta 1 is that when typing an URL in the address bar, when pops the autocompletion listbox, Opera increases its CPU usage getting more than 90%. I deleted ~/.opera and it worked fine at a first time. But after a few days using Opera when I have visited many websited the problem reappeared, so I suppose it's related to this new feature that searchs what you are typing in the address bar through history and cache. Then I updated to latest Beta 2 weeklie build available in Portage and the problem seems fixed. That's why I think www-client/opera-9.50_beta1 should be masked. jer@gentoo.org 2008-04-26 05:26:29 0000 Er, try www-client/opera-9.50_beta2! chescu@gmail.com 2008-04-26 12:16:58 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Er, try www-client/opera-9.50_beta2! > As you can read above: "Then I updated to latest Beta 2 weeklie build available in Portage and the problem seems fixed." jer@gentoo.org 2008-04-26 14:42:29 0000 Oh, sorry. Hadn't read all of it yet. I fail to see how users would miss the update when they sync their trees and update the world target. A package manager shouldn't care whether or not beta1 is masked - it should automatically update to beta2. But I will cut you a deal. I will simply remove beta1 from the tree - it's a rather unstable snapshot and it lacks features compared to the latest beta2 snapshots. Thanks for pointing me in this direction.