<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>216183</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-04-04 13:32 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-dialup/ppp-2.4.4 - ignores term signal completely on init or connect-script</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-04-12 08:38:36 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>r.mueller@unicomp-berlin.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>net-dialup@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>r.mueller@unicomp-berlin.de</who>
            <bug_when>2008-04-04 13:32:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>pppd completely ignores any signal when it runs &apos;nondetached&apos; and is executing scripts like &apos;init&apos; or &apos;connect&apos; script. it only can be killed by &quot;kill -9&quot;. 

responsible for this behavior is a patch which is should be a fix for the already resolved bug #181145 ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181145 ) , but which isn&apos;t a bug ! 

this bug doesn&apos;t appear with the original sources from &quot;http://ppp.samba.org&quot; but is introduced with the &quot;kill-pg.patch&quot;.

the bug described in #181145 isn&apos;t bug, since this behavior of pppd is well 	documented in the man-page. the problems this behavior may involve can be easily solved without touching &quot;pppd&quot;, as i described in comments on #181145 ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181145#c2 ). but the patch introduced with #181145 causes new problems as i mentioned before.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mrness@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-04-12 08:38:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in -r15.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>