215215 2008-03-28 15:56 0000 app-office/openoffice-2.4.0 fails with a bad patch. 2008-03-29 20:34:29 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 zeekec@mad.scientist.com openoffice@gentoo.org a_tevelev@yahoo.com che@chrekh.se eprparadocs@gmail.com esqualante@o2.pl fedux@lugmen.org.ar rdwald@gmail.com zeekec@mad.scientist.com 2008-03-28 15:56:59 0000 The configure.in portion of the gentoo-2.4.0.diff is no longer valid (I don't know if it's still needed or not.). >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking ooo-build-2.4.0.5.tar.gz to /gentoo/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-2.4.0/work * Applying gentoo-2.4.0.diff ... * Failed Patch: gentoo-2.4.0.diff ! * ( /gentoo/portage/app-office/openoffice/files/2.4.0/gentoo-2.4.0.diff ) * * Include in your bugreport the contents of: * * /gentoo/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-2.4.0/temp/gentoo-2.4.0.diff-16549.out * * ERROR: app-office/openoffice-2.4.0 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_unpack * environment, line 5419: Called epatch 'src_unpack' * environment, line 2388: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die "Failed Patch: ${patchname}!"; * The die message: * Failed Patch: gentoo-2.4.0.diff! * * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. * A complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/app-office:openoffice-2.4.0:20080328-153535.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/gentoo/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-2.4.0/temp/environment'. * !!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information: GENTOO_VM=sun-jdk-1.6 CLASSPATH="" JAVA_HOME="/opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.05" JAVACFLAGS="-source 1.4 -target 1.4" COMPILER="" and of course, the output of emerge --info alchark@gmail.com 2008-03-28 18:17:50 0000 It seems that configure.in does not need to be patched. In my case, unpatched line 1080 is as follows: elif test "$with_tag" = "OOH680_m12" ; then and not as this: elif test "$with_tag" = "OOH680_m11" ; then After removing the configure.in section from the patch, it applies well. suka@gentoo.org 2008-03-28 21:50:39 0000 Yeah, stupid mistake, forgot to update the patch... Thanks for reporting, should be fixed now suka@gentoo.org 2008-03-29 20:34:29 0000 *** Bug 215357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***