214077 2008-03-20 19:45 0000 dev-tex/cjk-latex-4.7.0 stable request 2008-03-23 23:30:49 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P2 normal --- 1 aballier@gentoo.org tex@gentoo.org cjk@gentoo.org fmccor@gentoo.org aballier@gentoo.org 2008-03-20 19:45:23 0000 Been there for a while; will be needed for texlive (and should be the last one that can go before the whole texlive ebuilds). fmccor@gentoo.org 2008-03-20 23:20:32 0000 Testing with texlive, I note that to run the examples, I also need to have the texlive-langcjk package; otherwise, lots of fonts are missing. Is this a problem or not? aballier@gentoo.org 2008-03-21 10:30:23 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Testing with texlive, I note that to run the examples, I also need to have the > texlive-langcjk package; otherwise, lots of fonts are missing. Is this a > problem or not? This is a good question; I'm enclined to say it's not a problem as you can specify fonts you want in your documents (and thus have missing fonts if you don't have 'em). However, if you really can't process any single file without texlive-langcjk, we could add this rdep: || ( texlive-langcjk tetex (I'm not sure it has more fonts) ptex (which will most likely have lots of such fonts) ) I didnt do this since cjk-latex comes with a good bunch of fonts, I assumed it doesnt really need more. fmccor@gentoo.org 2008-03-21 12:30:58 0000 Sparc stable, this works as expected. The examples causing problems seem to ask for fonts from texlang-cjk explicitly. So some of the examples assume the langcjk fonts, but not all. I don't think cjk-latex needs more fonts, and I don't know why its examples assume the availability of cjk fonts it doesn't supply. ranger@gentoo.org 2008-03-21 14:51:14 0000 ppc64 stable fauli@gentoo.org 2008-03-22 10:52:24 0000 x86/amd64 stable jer@gentoo.org 2008-03-22 17:38:14 0000 Stable for HPPA. armin76@gentoo.org 2008-03-23 17:44:37 0000 alpha/ia64 stable dertobi123@gentoo.org 2008-03-23 23:30:49 0000 ppc stable and closing