<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>213465</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-03-15 06:53 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stabilize mail-client/mail-notification-5.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-03-19 18:50:54 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>graaff@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>graaff@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>balage@makacs.duf.hu</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 06:53:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>mail-client/mail-notification-5.0 has been in the tree for ~2 months without reported bugs and it also has better compatibility with the now-stable evolution-2.12 series.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>balage@makacs.duf.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 08:43:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>But sometimes, when it detects no network connection, it eats up the CPU.
I have to click on &quot;Update&quot; to make things back to normal.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 09:01:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I haven&apos;t seen this behavior despite connectivity to one of my mail servers being spotty recently. Have you filed this as a bug somewhere?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>balage@makacs.duf.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 10:51:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>No, not yet. But I found this.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/mail-notification/+bug/182923

If I remember well, older mail-notifications had the same issue.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>balage@makacs.duf.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 10:52:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I forgot to mention. I&apos;m using mail-notification to monitor one IMAP, one Gmail (pop3) and one other POP3 account.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-15 12:56:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-16 08:27:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Balazs, you may want to report this also on the upstream bug, so that the mail-notification maintainers have more information to see a pattern. Given that this problem is also present in currently stable versions and seems to affect only few people I think we should still stabilize mail-notification 5.0.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-16 08:54:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>so x86 stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>balage@makacs.duf.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-16 09:22:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; Balazs, you may want to report this also on the upstream bug, so that the
&gt; mail-notification maintainers have more information to see a pattern. Given
&gt; that this problem is also present in currently stable versions and seems to
&gt; affect only few people I think we should still stabilize mail-notification 5.0.
&gt; 

It&apos;s okay.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-16 19:53:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fails to install on sparc :/

make  install-data-hook
make[4]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/work/mail-notification-5.0/help/C&apos;
/bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/image//usr/share/omf/mail-notification
mkdir -p -- /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/image//usr/share/omf/mail-notification
for file in mail-notification-C.omf; do \
                /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./$file.out /var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/image//usr/share/omf/mail-notification/$file; \
        done
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat `./mail-notification-C.omf.out&apos;: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [install-data-hook-omf] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/work/mail-notification-5.0/help/C&apos;
make[3]: *** [install-data-am] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/work/mail-notification-5.0/help/C&apos;
make[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/mail-notification-5.0/work/mail-notification-5.0/help/C&apos;
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-17 20:02:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That looks like a missing dependency on scrollkeeper. I&apos;ve just fixed that in CVS. Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>h0240248@edv1.boku.ac.at</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-18 09:17:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>you should add a useflag + dependency for net-mail/fetchyahoo and disable support for live hotmail until getlive (http://sourceforge.net/projects/getlive/) gets added to portage.

right now the gui shows support for both yahoo and hotmail by default but neither works.

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-18 14:49:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable, closing, Ruper please open a new bug</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>graaff@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-19 18:50:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>rupert, I agree with Raúl that you should have opened a new bug for this. In any case it&apos;s no longer needed now as I&apos;ve just added yahoo support with mail-notification-5.0-r1. I haven&apos;t added a hotmail use flag since getlive isn&apos;t in the tree. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>