<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>208999</bug_id>
          <alias>CVE-2008-0411</alias>
          <creation_ts>2008-02-05 13:58 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-text/ghostscript-* Stack-based buffer overflow in .seticcspace (CVE-2008-0411)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-03-08 18:30:41 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2008-001.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>A2 [glsa]</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>rbu@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>arm@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>corsair@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>dertobi123@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>fauli@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ferdy@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>fmccor@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>genstef@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>jer@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>m68k@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>printing@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>pva@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>s390@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>sh@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>tgall@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>welp@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-05 13:58:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stack-based buffer overflow in the zseticcspace() function in zicc.c, will result in arbitrary code execution.

Currently under embargo, awaiting upstream patch. The $URL is private.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-14 02:28:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Tom and Stefan, can you please create an ebuild with the patch applied and attach it to this bug. Do not commit anything to CVS yet as long as this bug is under embargo.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-14 02:28:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=143467)
ghostscript-8.60-CVE-2008-0411.diff

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-24 11:17:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Tom and Stefan, can you please prepare an ebuild so we can test this before Feb. 27?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 07:32:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=144554)
ghostscript-gnu-8.60.0-r1.ebuild.patch

I&apos;ll attach patch&apos;s for maintainer and others review. This one is for ghostscript-gnu. Other ghostscript packages will follow as soon as I test them...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 08:57:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=144560)
ghostscript-esp-8.15.4.ebuild.patch

Patch for ghostscript-esp. Includes lot&apos;s of quotations fixes.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 09:00:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=144561)
ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r2.ebuild.patch

And this is patch for ghostscript-gpl. But note during commit patch itself should go into  ghostscript-gpl-8.61-patchset-4.tar.bz2. So this patch is for testing purposes only.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 16:05:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Arch Security Liaisons, please test the attached ebuilds and report stable on this bug.

=app-text/ghostscript-esp-8.15.4-r1
Target keywords : &quot;alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k mips ppc ppc64 release s390 sh sparc x86&quot;

=app-text/ghostscript-gnu-8.60.0-r2
Target keywords : &quot;alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 release sh sparc x86&quot;

=app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3
Target keywords : &quot;ppc64 release&quot;


CC&apos;ing current Liaisons:
   alpha : ferdy
   amd64 : welp
    hppa : jer
     ppc : dertobi123
   ppc64 : corsair
 release : pva
   sparc : fmccor
     x86 : opfer
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 16:06:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Oh, and thanks Peter for preparing the ebuilds and doing some QA on the existing ones.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 17:47:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Both are good for HPPA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 17:51:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; Arch Security Liaisons, please test the attached ebuilds and report stable on
&gt; this bug.

There is something wrong with the keywords:
&gt; =app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3
&gt; Target keywords : &quot;ppc64 release&quot;

 Especially this one.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 17:55:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; (In reply to comment #7)
&gt; &gt; Arch Security Liaisons, please test the attached ebuilds and report stable on
&gt; &gt; this bug.
&gt; 
&gt; There is something wrong with the keywords:
&gt; &gt; =app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3
&gt; &gt; Target keywords : &quot;ppc64 release&quot;
&gt; 
&gt;  Especially this one.

Not just that - AFAIK ghostscript-esp is getting dropped somewhere in the future and this bug doesn&apos;t have an attachment that patches a ghostscript-esp ebuild.

Also odd is that patch to a few ebuilds were posted instead of the new ebuilds themselves as is common practice.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 17:58:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; (In reply to comment #10)
&gt; &gt; (In reply to comment #7)
&gt; &gt; &gt; Arch Security Liaisons, please test the attached ebuilds and report stable on
&gt; &gt; &gt; this bug.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; There is something wrong with the keywords:
&gt; &gt; &gt; =app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3
&gt; &gt; &gt; Target keywords : &quot;ppc64 release&quot;
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt;  Especially this one.
&gt; 
&gt; Not just that - AFAIK ghostscript-esp is getting dropped somewhere in the
&gt; future and this bug doesn&apos;t have an attachment that patches a ghostscript-esp
&gt; ebuild.

 It does.  See comment #5.
 
&gt; Also odd is that patch to a few ebuilds were posted instead of the new ebuilds
&gt; themselves as is common practice.

 Not that bad.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 18:03:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; There is something wrong with the keywords:

Yes, sorry. I mixed up gpl and gnu.


=app-text/ghostscript-esp-8.15.4-r1
Target keywords : &quot;alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k mips ppc ppc64 release s390
sh sparc x86&quot;

=app-text/ghostscript-gnu-8.60.0-r2
Target keywords : &quot;ppc64 release&quot;

=app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3
Target keywords : &quot;alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 release sh sparc x86&quot;
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 18:09:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok...-gpl and -esp fine on x86, they survived my stress test with different things on a really huge PostScript file.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 18:15:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #12)
&gt;  It does.  See comment #5.

Ow, missed that. Sorry.

&gt; &gt; Also odd is that patch to a few ebuilds were posted instead of the new ebuilds
&gt; &gt; themselves as is common practice.
&gt; 
&gt;  Not that bad.

It&apos;s bad when you require seven people to download and apply three patches individually - it&apos;s one more step to perform in testing each of the ebuilds.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-25 18:28:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Jeroen I didn&apos;t knew that and will do next time. Right now I&apos;ve downloaded 5 patches for shorewall* packages and believe me - patches are not so hard to use ;) Just 2-3 additional commands but they worth it as patch greatly simplify review. If that&apos;s necessary I can attach full ebuilds now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-26 04:22:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ghostscript-esp is good for HPPA too.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-26 19:55:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>looks good on ppc ...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-28 08:33:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>looks good on ppc64, too.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fmccor@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-28 21:13:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ghostscript-gpl-8.61.r2 is good on sparc; the others look good on sparc.  I also thought ghostscript-esp was either dying or dead, but it does look good.  Why are we keeping it around?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>welp@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-28 21:51:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Looks good for amd64 too.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rbu@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-29 08:54:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is public now. Peter/Printing, can you commit this to the tree with the stable keywords mentioned here. I can re-cc the missing arches. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-02-29 12:22:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Commited in the tree.

Target keywords left:
=app-text/ghostscript-esp-8.15.4-r1: &quot;release, alpha, arm, ia64, m68k, mips, s390, sh&quot;
=app-text/ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r3: &quot;release, alpha, arm, ia64, m68k, sh&quot;

Seems that the only reason to keep app-text/ghostscript-esp in the tree is that mips, s390 and sh still have not keyworded/stabilized app-text/ghostscript-{gpl,gnu}.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>armin76@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-01 20:21:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha/ia64 stable, Robert, i think i told you to cc me on restricted bugs, i hate you now! :P</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dirtyepic@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-01 22:18:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>mips is going all ~arch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-02 08:32:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in release snapshot.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-02 15:26:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Seems ready for GLSA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tgurr@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-04 21:08:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Just a note: I committed ghostscript-gpl-8.62 to the tree a few minutes ago which had the fix applied upstream.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>py@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-03-08 18:30:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200803-14</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>143467</attachid>
            <date>2008-02-14 02:28 0000</date>
            <desc>ghostscript-8.60-CVE-2008-0411.diff</desc>
            <filename>ghostscript-8.60-CVE-2008-0411.diff</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIHNyYy96aWNjLmMKKysrIHNyYy96aWNjLmMJMjAwOC0wMi0wNSAxNjoxMTo1OS4wMDAwMDAw
MDAgKzAwMDAKQEAgLTc3LDYgKzc3LDkgQEAgenNldGljY3NwYWNlKGlfY3R4X3QgKiBpX2N0eF9w
KQogICAgIGRpY3RfZmluZF9zdHJpbmcob3AsICJOIiwgJnBudmFsKTsKICAgICBuY29tcHMgPSBw
bnZhbC0+dmFsdWUuaW50dmFsOwogCisgICAgaWYgKDIqbmNvbXBzID4gc2l6ZW9mKHJhbmdlX2J1
ZmYpL3NpemVvZihmbG9hdCkpCisJcmV0dXJuX2Vycm9yKGVfcmFuZ2VjaGVjayk7CisKICAgICAv
KiB2ZXJpZnkgdGhlIERhdGFTb3VyY2UgZW50cnkgKi8KICAgICBpZiAoZGljdF9maW5kX3N0cmlu
ZyhvcCwgIkRhdGFTb3VyY2UiLCAmcHN0cm12YWwpIDw9IDApCiAgICAgICAgIHJldHVybl9lcnJv
cihlX3VuZGVmaW5lZCk7Cg==
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>144554</attachid>
            <date>2008-02-25 07:32 0000</date>
            <desc>ghostscript-gnu-8.60.0-r1.ebuild.patch</desc>
            <filename>ghostscript-gnu-8.60.0-r1.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC91c3IvcG9ydGFnZS9hcHAtdGV4dC9naG9zdHNjcmlwdC1nbnUvZ2hvc3RzY3JpcHQtZ251
LTguNjAuMC1yMS5lYnVpbGQJMjAwNy0xMS0xNCAwOTozNTozMS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAzMDAKKysr
IGdob3N0c2NyaXB0LWdudS04LjYwLjAtcjIuZWJ1aWxkCTIwMDgtMDItMjUgMDk6NDI6NTIuMDAw
MDAwMDAwICswMzAwCkBAIC01Niw2ICs1Niw3IEBACiAJY2QgIiR7U30iCiAKIAllcGF0Y2ggIiR7
RklMRVNESVJ9Ii9naG9zdHNjcmlwdC1DVkUtMjAwNy0yNzIxLnBhdGNoCisJZXBhdGNoICIke0ZJ
TEVTRElSfSIvZ2hvc3RzY3JpcHQtOC42MC1DVkUtMjAwOC0wNDExLmRpZmYKIAogCSMgc2VhcmNo
IHBhdGggZml4CiAJc2VkIC1pIC1lICJzOlwkXChnc2RhdGFkaXJcKS9saWI6L3Vzci9zaGFyZS9n
aG9zdHNjcmlwdC8ke1BWTX0vJChnZXRfbGliZGlyKToiIFwK
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>144560</attachid>
            <date>2008-02-25 08:57 0000</date>
            <desc>ghostscript-esp-8.15.4.ebuild.patch</desc>
            <filename>ghostscript-esp-8.15.4.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC91c3IvcG9ydGFnZS9hcHAtdGV4dC9naG9zdHNjcmlwdC1lc3AvZ2hvc3RzY3JpcHQtZXNw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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>144561</attachid>
            <date>2008-02-25 09:00 0000</date>
            <desc>ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r2.ebuild.patch</desc>
            <filename>ghostscript-gpl-8.61-r2.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIGdob3N0c2NyaXB0LWdwbC04LjYxLXIyLmVidWlsZAkyMDA4LTAyLTI1IDA5OjI4OjU0LjAw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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>