<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>206006</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-01-15 21:23 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>ebuilds depending on dev-util/xdelta needs to be checked and fixed.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-06-17 14:35:38 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>trivial</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>ssuominen@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>maintainer-needed@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>darkside@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>games@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>kde@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-15 21:23:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We have now =dev-util/xdelta-1* in SLOT=&quot;0&quot; and =dev-util/xdelta-3* in SLOT=&quot;3&quot;.

Version 1 is providing binary called &apos;xdelta&apos; but version 3 is providing 
one with &apos;xdelta3&apos;.

So either.. lock down xdelta dep. for rune to version 1, or test it with 
version 3 and adjust the command in ebuild accordingly.

(It requires a CDROM to be present which I don&apos;t obviously have, sorry.)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-15 21:56:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>For these I&apos;ve changed ebuilds to depend on =dev-util/xdelta-1* for now.

games-strategy/heroes3-1.3.1a-r2
games-util/loki_patch-20050324
games-util/loki_patch-20051209
games-action/rune

For these I&apos;ve changed kde-meta.eclass to DEPEND 
on =dev-util/xdelta-1* for now.

kde-base/artsplugin-mpg123-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/dcopc-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/dcopperl-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kcheckpass-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kdeaddons-kfile-plugins-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kdeartwork-sounds-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kdebugdialog-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kdesdk-misc-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kreadconfig-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kspy-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/kstart-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/libksieve-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/librss-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/qtsharp-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/secpolicy-3.5.0:kdexdeltas
kde-base/xparts-3.5.0:kdexdeltas</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>darkside@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-06 02:40:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>What needs to be done here? and why is it assigned to maintainer-needed?

Thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-12 18:52:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; What needs to be done here? and why is it assigned to maintainer-needed?
&gt; 
&gt; Thanks.
&gt; 

xdelta-1 and xdelta-3 are for same purpose, but different packages. version -1 installs command xdelta, and a shared library to go with. version -3 installs command xdelta3 and no shared library.

so if ebuilds are only using the command xdelta, not the shared library, they should be converted into xdelta3 after verifying it works. also, i&apos;m not sure is the command-line syntax same.

assigned to maintainer-needed, because xdelta is maintainer-needed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-12 18:56:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>the reasoning to switch into xdelta3 is simple -&gt; it&apos;s maintained, upstream.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nyhm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-12 19:07:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This needs fixing:

app-portage/deltup/deltup-0.4.4.ebuild:	|| ( dev-util/bdelta &gt;=dev-util/xdelta-1.1.3 )


Does xdelta-3 use the same file format as xdelta-1?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>theli@ukr.net</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-13 04:32:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; Does xdelta-3 use the same file format as xdelta-1?
&gt; 
No
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-13 13:57:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; (In reply to comment #5)
&gt; &gt; Does xdelta-3 use the same file format as xdelta-1?
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; No
&gt; 

So there&apos;s very little chance, if any, of -3 working for apps using -1 now?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>theli@ukr.net</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-13 14:29:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; So there&apos;s very little chance, if any, of -3 working for apps using -1 now?
it is a complete rewrite, has different format and completely different command line arguments

it is possible to use it for some packages as rune... the delta file needs to be recreated for this though</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>theli@ukr.net</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-13 14:32:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>xdelta1 - rsync algorithm
xdelta3 - standardized VCDIFF format</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-17 14:08:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; This needs fixing:
&gt; 
&gt; app-portage/deltup/deltup-0.4.4.ebuild: || ( dev-util/bdelta
&gt; &gt;=dev-util/xdelta-1.1.3 )

Fixed, and closing this bug as there&apos;s nothing left to do (based on last comments)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>theli@ukr.net</who>
            <bug_when>2008-06-17 14:35:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; (In reply to comment #5)
&gt; &gt; This needs fixing:
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; app-portage/deltup/deltup-0.4.4.ebuild: || ( dev-util/bdelta
&gt; &gt; &gt;=dev-util/xdelta-1.1.3 )
&gt; 
&gt; Fixed, and closing this bug as there&apos;s nothing left to do (based on last
&gt; comments)
&gt; 
i&apos;m not sure deltup should depend on xdelta||bdelta ... deltup is a wrapper utility for several binary-delta-patches .. including bdelta and xdelta1 (two different formats)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>