<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>199738</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-11-20 07:59 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>stabilize sys-cluster/vzctl-3.0.18-r1 and sys-fs/vzquota-3.0.11</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-07-07 12:32:38 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Unspecified</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>STABLEREQ</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>pva@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>vserver-devs@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-11-20 07:59:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>arch teams, please, stabilize sys-cluster/vzctl-3.0.18-r1 and sys-fs/vzquota-3.0.11. More than month in portage, no open bugs. Thank you.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-11-20 10:43:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Eh, forgot to note. If you wish to proceed with the same procedure as in bug 198632 (I take stabilization myself) then just tell me. I can do that.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ssuominen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-11-20 12:32:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Eh, forgot to note. If you wish to proceed with the same procedure as in bug
&gt; 198632 (I take stabilization myself) then just tell me. I can do that.
&gt; 

for amd64, please do.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-11-21 06:37:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>My opinion since last stabilisation hasn&apos;t changed: If you can test it on x86 hardware, stable it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-11-27 13:18:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>You have our oks, so do.  Bye. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-12-24 10:33:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok. Have permition. Stable. FIXED.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pva@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2009-07-07 12:32:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 271071 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>