199546 2007-11-18 15:41 0000 dev-cpp/glibmm-2.14.2 do not need anymore the fbsd patchset 2008-07-18 09:15:17 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo/Alt FreeBSD unspecified All FreeBSD RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 toffanin.mauro@gmail.com bsd@gentoo.org gnome-mm@gentoo.org toffanin.mauro@gmail.com 2007-11-18 15:41:37 0000 dev-cpp/glibmm-2.14.2 fail unpack phase because do not found the patch "glibmm-2.14.2-date.patch": * Running elibtoolize in: glibmm-2.14.2/scripts * Applying portage-1.5.10.patch ... * Applying max_cmd_len-1.5.20.patch ... * Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ... * Applying fbsd-conf-1.5.20b.patch ... * Applying glibmm-2.14.2-date.patch ... * Failed Patch: glibmm-2.14.2-date.patch ! * ( /usr/portage/dev-cpp/glibmm/files/glibmm-2.14.2-date.patch ) * * Include in your bugreport the contents of: * * /var/tmp/portage/dev-cpp/glibmm-2.14.2/temp/glibmm-2.14.2-date.patch-10075.out dev-cpp/glibmm-2.14.2 do not need the patch made by Roy Marple about GTime and time_t (as done in glibmm-2.14.0-date.patch) because the problem has been fixed upstream for the 2.14.2 release; indeed glibmm-2.14.2 now compile and run fine on g/fbsd. Reproducible: Always toffanin.mauro@gmail.com 2007-11-18 15:42:15 0000 Created an attachment (id=136297) glibmm-2.14.2.ebuild.patch toffanin.mauro@gmail.com 2007-12-07 10:41:30 0000 *** Bug 201533 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** aballier@gentoo.org 2008-07-18 08:54:16 0000 gnome-mm team: what's the status of 2.14.2? It's still here because of slacking arches, right ? I can't build it, most likely because of too recent glib. I think I could just remove fbsd keyword from 2.14.2 and drop the patch, no time to waste in supporting old libs. Opinions? remi@gentoo.org 2008-07-18 09:01:19 0000 I want to stabilize glibmm 2.16.4. But as you've noted, we're stuck with slacking arches (I won't name them...) I'm currently preparing the stable list for gnome-mm packages. You're allowed to whip me if I don't get it out today :) Thanks aballier@gentoo.org 2008-07-18 09:15:17 0000 (In reply to comment #4) > I'm currently preparing the stable list for gnome-mm packages. You're allowed > to whip me if I don't get it out today :) As we don't have stable keywords for bsd, that's not really our problem ;) I've removed the broken patch, dropped the x86-fbsd keyword for 2.14.2 as 2.16.4 seems fine. Therefore, bug "fixed" 136297 2007-11-18 15:42 0000 glibmm-2.14.2.ebuild.patch glibmm-2.14.2.ebuild.patch text/plain LS0tIGdsaWJtbS0yLjE0LjIuZWJ1aWxkCTIwMDctMTEtMTggMTU6MTQ6MzEgKzAxMDAKKysrIGds aWJtbS0yLjE0LjIuZWJ1aWxkCTIwMDctMTEtMTggMTU6MTQ6NDEgKzAxMDAKQEAgLTI4LDkgKzI4 LDYgQEAKIAkJc2VkIC1pICdzL15cKFNVQkRJUlMgPS4qXClleGFtcGxlc1woLipcKSQvXDFcMi8n IE1ha2VmaWxlLmluIHx8IFwKIAkJCWRpZSAic2VkIE1ha2VmaWxlLmluIGZhaWxlZCIKIAlmaQot Ci0JIyBHVGltZSBhbmQgdGltZV90IGFyZSBlcXVpdmFsZW50IG9uIGZic2QsIHNvIHdlIGNhbm5v dCBkZWZpbmUgYm90aAotCXVzZSB4ODYtZmJzZCAmJiBlcGF0Y2ggIiR7RklMRVNESVJ9LyR7UH0t ZGF0ZS5wYXRjaCIKIH0KIAogc3JjX2luc3RhbGwoKSB7Cg==