198544 2007-11-09 10:27 0000 stabilize sys-fs/inotify-tools 2007-11-25 03:22:53 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds 2006.1 All Linux RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P2 enhancement --- 1 bugzilla-gentoo@bwurst.org wschlich@gentoo.org hanno@gentoo.org bugzilla-gentoo@bwurst.org 2007-11-09 10:27:43 0000 No stable version available at the moment on amd64. I installed sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11 and have no problems. hanno@gentoo.org 2007-11-11 14:31:44 0000 cc-ing archs cla@gentoo.org 2007-11-11 16:18:56 0000 On x86 it fails on make check make[5]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11' make[5]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11' event_to_str: test begin event_to_str: test end event_to_str_sep: test begin event_to_str_sep: test end str_to_event: test begin str_to_event: test end str_to_event_sep: test begin str_to_event_sep: test end basic_watch_info: test begin basic_watch_info: test end watch_limit: test begin watch_limit: Warning, this test may take a while test.c:271 Test 'watch_limit' failed: Actual (sbrk(0)): 136425472, Expected (sbrk_ptr): 136384512 tst_inotifytools_snprintf: test begin tst_inotifytools_snprintf: test end Out of 145208 tests, 145207 succeeded and 1 failed. FAIL: test ===================================== 1 of 1 tests failed Please report to rohan@mcgovern.id.au ===================================== make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11/libinotifytools/src' make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11/libinotifytools/src' make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11/libinotifytools/src' make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/paludis/sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11/work/inotify-tools-3.11/libinotifytools' make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR in sys-fs/inotify-tools-3.11: !!! In src_test at line 29 !!! make check failed Paludis build information: Compiler: CXX: i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2) CXXFLAGS: -O2 -march=pentium-m -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe LDFLAGS: DATE: 2007-11-06T15:48:32+0100 Package information: app-admin/eselect-compiler: (none) app-shells/bash: 3.2_p17 dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.33-r1 dev-lang/python: 2.4.4-r6 dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r6 dev-util/ccache: (none) dev-util/confcache: (none) sys-apps/baselayout: 1.12.9-r2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.18.1-r2 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.61-r1 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10 sys-devel/binutils: 2.18-r1 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.16 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.24 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.22-r2 ssuominen@gentoo.org 2007-11-11 17:43:26 0000 same for amd64, fails at make check, test.c:271 Test 'watch_limit' failed: Actual (sbrk(0)): 8781824, Expected (sbrk_ptr): 8757248 ssuominen@gentoo.org 2007-11-12 23:17:18 0000 (In reply to comment #1) > cc-ing archs > un-cc-ing amd64, add us back when it's fixed fauli@gentoo.org 2007-11-18 11:02:09 0000 Wolfram, could you please look into the failures? wschlich@gentoo.org 2007-11-18 22:57:26 0000 I have tried to contact Rohan, will let you know when I got his attention ;) wschlich@gentoo.org 2007-11-18 23:22:33 0000 Wow, that was quicker than I hoped ;) He will take care about it next weekend (maybe earlier). Will keep you up2date. wschlich@gentoo.org 2007-11-24 01:58:29 0000 --8<-- 24 November 2007: inotify-tools 3.12 released. Changes: * Fix: inability to free memory allocated by inotifytools, and bogus memory leak check (causing `make check' to fail on some systems). * Fix: spurious warning when the `--format' option is given to inotifywait. * Fix: inotifywait fails to watch newly created directories when recursively watching a symlink to a directory. --8<-- 3.12 is in CVS. So, either you ignore the "make check" results, or you wait until you can consider 3.12 for stable marking :) ssuominen@gentoo.org 2007-11-24 09:25:52 0000 amd64 stable But.. entire src_compile() should be removed since it only does econf, emake without arguments? wschlich@gentoo.org 2007-11-24 12:16:17 0000 (In reply to comment #9) > amd64 stable > > But.. entire src_compile() should be removed since it only does econf, emake > without arguments? Yep, you're right. Either I can do it, or x86 can do it when they touch the ebuild anyway ;) cla@gentoo.org 2007-11-25 03:22:53 0000 x86 stable, so closing