197046 2007-10-25 15:32 0000 Stabilize several app-xemacs packages 2007-11-25 15:06:15 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED STABLEREQ P5 enhancement --- 1 graaff@gentoo.org xemacs@gentoo.org amd64@gentoo.org graaff@gentoo.org 2007-10-25 15:32:00 0000 The following xemacs packages contain significant improvements compared to the currently stable versions, so I'd like to ask for these packages to be stabilized. All have been in the tree for quite some time already without any open bugs. app-xemacs/calendar-1.32 app-xemacs/gnus-1.91 app-xemacs/mail-lib-1.79 app-xemacs/riece-1.23 (note: no stable version for alpha, and newer version not keyworded at all for ppc64) app-xemacs/tramp-1.37 (note: newer version not keyworded at all for ppc64) fauli@gentoo.org 2007-10-25 17:37:18 0000 For some of these packages you can use the test plans of the GNU Emacs pendants...ok, maybe only tramp. :) http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/wiki/test%20plans nixnut@gentoo.org 2007-10-26 18:17:10 0000 stable on ppc fauli@gentoo.org 2007-10-26 22:56:34 0000 x86 stable corsair@gentoo.org 2007-10-28 13:53:06 0000 ppc64 stable (even those versions without ~ppc64, I've tested them and don't think anybody would test them in another 30 days...) armin76@gentoo.org 2007-10-29 10:27:01 0000 alpha/sparc stable graaff@gentoo.org 2007-11-25 15:06:15 0000 Marked amd64 stable as per kingtaco's email to core on 14-nov-2007. I'm using amd64 myself, and these packages should be arch-independent in the first place.