<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>195894</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-10-14 21:56 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>switch virtual/tetex deps to virtual/latex-base to avoid circual deps with texlive</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2008-01-15 19:38:52 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>195815</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>aballier@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>tex@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>beber@meleeweb.net</cc>
    
    <cc>mreincke@gmx.net</cc>
    
    <cc>text-markup@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-14 21:56:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;m planning to add a meta ebuild that will pulls in what texlive provides, this includes your packages but they depend on virtual/tetex.
I&apos;ve added virtual/latex-base for such cases and have tested them against it for texlive.


replacing virtual/tetex by virtual/latex-base in the deps should be ok.


packages:
media-libs/freetype-1 : DEPEND=&quot;tetex? ( virtual/tetex )&quot;
media-libs/t1lib :   doc? ( virtual/tetex )

eclass:
latex-package.eclass : DEPEND=&quot;virtual/tetex
(this one is marked as text-markup but it seems to have been forgotten in the split to tex herd)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dirtyepic@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 03:47:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>feel free to touch whatever fonts packages you need.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 12:55:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; feel free to touch whatever fonts packages you need.
&gt; 

thanks fixed both freetype 1 and t1lib; only left is latex-package.eclass, I will check all packages inheriting it and we&apos;ll be done there.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 20:36:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>@ulrich: dev-tex/feynmf needs metapost to compile, as I&apos;m planning to switch virtual/tetex dep from latex-package to virtual/latex-base it will have bad deps with texlive. I&apos;ll attach a diff to the ebuild</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 20:36:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=133561)
feynmf diff

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ulm@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 20:58:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; @ulrich: dev-tex/feynmf needs metapost to compile, as I&apos;m planning to switch
&gt; virtual/tetex dep from latex-package to virtual/latex-base it will have bad
&gt; deps with texlive. I&apos;ll attach a diff to the ebuild

Sorry, I can&apos;t test this at the moment. Feel free to modify feynmf as necessary for texlive. See bug #106909 comment #9 for a test case.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 21:41:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
 
&gt;Sorry, I can&apos;t test this at the moment. Feel free to modify feynmf as necessary
&gt;for texlive. See bug #106909 comment #9 for a test case.


tested and deps changed
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 21:53:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>latex-package eclass updated, everything should be fine now on that regard</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mreincke@gmx.net</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-15 23:41:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>what about app-vim/latexsuite? I&apos;m wondering whether it shouldn&apos;t depend on virtual/latex-base instead of virtual/tetex?
Sorry in case this is unrelated...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>aballier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2007-10-16 06:13:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; what about app-vim/latexsuite? I&apos;m wondering whether it shouldn&apos;t depend on
&gt; virtual/latex-base instead of virtual/tetex?
&gt; Sorry in case this is unrelated...
&gt; 

yes, it might be, but when I&apos;ll have added the meta texlive ebuild, this one will provide virtual/tetex so deps will be fine as virtual/latex-base is a subset of virtual/tetex;
for now the goal is to integrate texlive, we&apos;ll see about tightening(?) the deps later </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>beber@meleeweb.net</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-06 02:14:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>app-text/linuxdoc-tools still depends on tetex? ( &gt;=app-text/tetex-3 )</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>livrerie@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2008-01-15 19:38:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; app-text/linuxdoc-tools still depends on tetex? ( &gt;=app-text/tetex-3 )
&gt; 

I&apos;m on amd64. I&apos;m afraid that app-vim/latexsuite too still depends directly on app-text/tetex, so we are force to resort to a package.provided hack to install it with texlive. Should not this tetex package be removed anyway, since it&apos;s not maintained upstream anymore and is replaced by texlive?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>133561</attachid>
            <date>2007-10-15 20:36 0000</date>
            <desc>feynmf diff</desc>
            <filename>feynmf.diff</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">SW5kZXg6IGZleW5tZi0xLjA4LXIxLmVidWlsZAo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>